Skill

think-boundary-critique

Audits the boundary judgments that silently define a problem frame. For each of four sources, who benefits, who decides, whose knowledge counts, who has standing, it contrasts the descriptive is boundary against the normative ought boundary, names the gaps, and lists the affected-but-excluded partie

Claim this listing

Connect your GitHub to prove you own or maintain this listing. We verify repo access automatically — most publishers are confirmed in seconds.

1Connect GitHub
2Submit your claim
3Auto-verified, or reviewed within 48h