dev.realitygraph/verification-tools

MCPCommunitylive
v2.0.0dev.realitygraphUnknownAktualisiert vor 2 Mon.

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Endpunkt-Statuslive
geprüft vor 7 Tagen · 678 ms
100 % der letzten 5 Prüfungen haben diesen Endpunkt erreicht
Läuft in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Abgeleitet aus den Transporten, die dieser Eintrag deklariert (streamable-http). Ein Client, der hier nicht steht, ist damit nicht ausgeschlossen — Forge kann ihn nur nicht bestätigen.

Automatisch aus öffentlichen Quellen indexiert. Vom Entwickler auf Forge noch nicht verifiziert.Diesen Eintrag beanspruchen →
vor 2 Mon.Letzte Aktualisierung
Paket
Autordev.realitygraph
LizenzUnknown
Version2.0.0
Quellemcp-registry
Trust-Status
B
60/100Gut
✓Im Forge-Index gelistet+10/10
—Publisher-Identität verifiziert+0/30
→ Publisher: für diesen Eintrag ist kein Repository hinterlegt, daher kann `forge publish` die Inhaberschaft nicht automatisch prüfen. Nutze oben „Diesen Eintrag beanspruchen“ — Forge prüft diese Fälle von Hand.
—Domain-Verifizierung+0/10
→ Für diesen Eintragstyp derzeit nicht verfügbar — die Domain-Prüfung läuft heute nur für npm-gestützte Pakete, diese Zeile lässt sich hier also noch nicht erreichen, unabhängig davon, was auf der Domain liegt.
✓Prompt-Injection-Scan · sauber+30/30
✓Obfuskations-/Exfiltrations-Scan · sauber+20/20
StatusVon der Community indexiert
PublisherNicht verifiziert
SignaturNicht signiert
Domain—
Herkunft—
AbhängigkeitenNicht auditiert
Tool-Oberfläche10 Tools · keines privilegiert
Sicherheits-Scan✓ Saubervlive · vor 26 TWie gut funktioniert dieser Scan?
EvaluierungenKeine
Indexiert3. Juli 2026

Die Verifizierung bestätigt die Identität des Publishers (die Inhaberschaft am Repo), nicht die Sicherheit des Codes. Der Sicherheits-Scan deckt bekannte CVEs und verdächtige Installationsskripte ab.

Tools

10 Tools · keines privilegiert
Live am Endpunkt des Anbieters beobachtet26d ago

Aus einem echten MCP-Handshake initialize → tools/list gegen den deklarierten Endpunkt gelesen. Es wurde nie ein Tool aufgerufen — tools/list ist der lesende Introspektionsaufruf, den das Protokoll dafür vorsieht. Es spiegelt wider, was der Server in diesem Moment angeboten hat; ein gehosteter Endpunkt ist an keine Version gebunden und kann sich ohne Ankündigung ändern.

  • https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp10 Tools · 826 ms
check_verification_debtEstimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

Estimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

ParameterTypBeschreibung
team_size*integerNumber of developers on the team (required)
ai_share_percentnumberShare of merges that are AI-assisted, in percent (default: 60, assumption)
prs_per_monthintegerTotal merged PRs per month (default: team_size x prs_per_engineer_per_month)
merged_loc_per_weeknumberMerged changed lines of code per week (enables the GVR and review-depth metrics)
reviewer_hours_per_weeknumberReviewer hours actually spent per week (enables the GVR metric)
substantive_review_comments_per_weeknumberSubstantive review comments per week, excluding bots and nitpicks (enables the review-depth metric)
ai_merges_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month (enables the unverified-merge rate)
ai_merges_with_evidence_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month with recorded validation evidence (enables the unverified-merge rate)
two_week_churn_percentnumberShare of new lines revised or reverted within 14 days, in percent. A warning signal in the metrics block; it never enters the cost model, because it measures l…
rework_rate_percentnumberShare of AI-assisted changes reworked for a defect within 14 days, in percent (default: 2, the illustrative rate from /cost-of-verification-debt - replace it w…
prs_per_engineer_per_monthnumberMerged PRs per engineer per month (default: 20, derived from the published worked report on /measure-verification-debt)
hourly_rate_eurnumberLoaded cost per engineer hour in EUR (default: 75, assumption)
hours_per_reworked_changenumberAverage hours per reworked change (default: 6, assumption)
review_reconstruction_hours_per_prnumberAverage reviewer hours spent reconstructing intent per AI-assisted PR (default: 0.5, assumption)
incident_allowance_eur_per_yearnumberAnnual incident allowance in EUR (default: 0; add one only when you have a locally defined incident class, frequency and expected-loss method)
langstringReport language (default: en)
lint_task_specCheck whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

Check whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

ParameterTypBeschreibung
task*stringThe work order / task text you intend to give an AI coding agent (English or German)
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_task_contract_templateReturns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

Returns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

ParameterTypBeschreibung
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
validate_task_contractDeterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

Deterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

ParameterTypBeschreibung
contract*stringThe filled task contract as a JSON string (structure from get_task_contract_template, format='json')
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_verification_report_templateReturns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

Returns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

ParameterTypBeschreibung
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
searchFull-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

Full-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

ParameterTypBeschreibung
query*stringSearch query (English or German)
langstringRestrict results to one language (default: both)
fetchFetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

Fetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

ParameterTypBeschreibung
id*stringDocument id from search results, or a realitygraph.dev URL
plan_change_verificationTurn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

Turn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

ParameterTypBeschreibung
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
check_release_readinessReturn GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

Return GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

ParameterTypBeschreibung
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
acceptance_criteria_passed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_failed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_not_run*integer—
checks*array—
rollback_ready*boolean—
monitoring_ready*boolean—
known_limitations_recorded*boolean—
independent_review*boolean—
calculate_verification_capacityCalculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

Calculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

ParameterTypBeschreibung
ai_changes_per_week*integer—
average_review_minutes_per_change*number—
available_reviewer_hours_per_week*number—
evidence_coverage_percent*number—
two_week_churn_percentnumber—
langstringResponse language (default: en)

10 von 10 Tools haben eine Beschreibung veröffentlicht.

Tool-Namen und -Beschreibungen stammen vom Publisher und werden wortgetreu als inerter Text angezeigt. Es sind die Zeichenketten, die ein MCP-Client an ein Modell übergibt, deshalb prüft Forge sie auf Prompt-Injection-Muster — jeder Befund erscheint oben beim Sicherheits-Scan. „Privilegiert“ ist ein Schlagwort-Treffer im Tool-Namen, keine Prüfung dessen, was das Tool tut: ein harmlos klingender Name kann trotzdem alles tun.

Über

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Schlagwörter
mcp
Alternativen
Tool-Oberflächen werden verglichen…

Keine Abdeckung der Abhängigkeiten

Dieser Eintrag veröffentlicht kein npm-Paket, daher hat Forge keinen Abhängigkeitsbaum dafür. Das ist eine Lücke in der Abdeckung — keine Aussage, dass er keine Abhängigkeiten hat.