analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence

SKILLFlujo de trabajocomunidad
v0.0.0seikaikyoMITActualizado hace 6 dFuente →

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attributi

Community-submitted skill. Not yet reviewed by the Forge team. Full prompt content may not be available.Request review →
2Estrellas del repo
1Clientes
1Formatos
hace 6 dÚltima actualización
Skill
Autorseikaikyo
Versión0.0.0
LicenciaMIT
CategoríaFlujo de trabajo
Formatosskill.md
PromptNo publicado
Compatibilidad
Claude✓ Compatible
Cursor
Copilot
ChatGPT
Gemini
Acerca de

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

Palabras clave
skillclaude