Search 197,000+ Pakistani judgments by keyword, citation, or the legal question they settle.
Inferido de los transportes que declara este listado (streamable-http). Que un cliente no aparezca aquí no significa que se haya descartado: simplemente Forge no puede confirmarlo.
La verificación confirma la identidad del publicador (la propiedad del repo), no la seguridad del código. El análisis de seguridad cubre los CVE conocidos y los scripts de instalación sospechosos.
Leído de un handshake MCP real initialize → tools/list contra el endpoint declarado. No se invocó ninguna herramienta: tools/list es la llamada de introspección de solo lectura que el protocolo define para esto. Refleja lo que el servidor anunciaba en ese momento; un endpoint alojado no está fijado a ninguna versión y puede cambiar sin avisar.
https://pakistancaselaw.com/mcp7 herramientas · 966 mscaselaw_searchFull-text search of Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court & High Courts, 1970 onward).
Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to the legal point decides which cases are
returned; among comparably-near cases, more senior court > larger bench > more recent >
more cited. Use sort='newest' whe…Full-text search of Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court & High Courts, 1970 onward). Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to the legal point decides which cases are returned; among comparably-near cases, more senior court > larger bench > more recent > more cited. Use sort='newest' whe…
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| query* | string | Keywords, e.g. 'bail murder 302' or 'khula dower' |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| sort | string | relevance (default: nearest on the point, then court/bench/recency/citations) | newest (latest law first — useful because amendments supersede) | court (most s… |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_search_questionsFind judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain.
Every AI summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g.
"Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused to bail?" This searches those
questions, so it matches the shap…Find judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain. Every AI summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g. "Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused to bail?" This searches those questions, so it matches the shap…
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| query* | string | The legal question or its subject, in the words a judgment would use — 'delay in lodging FIR', 'concurrent findings of fact', 'pre-arrest bail murder' |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_lookup_citationFind the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation.
Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34.
Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape
as caselaw_search.Find the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation. Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34. Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape as caselaw_search.
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| journal* | string | Law-report code, e.g. 'PLD', 'SCMR', 'CLC' |
| year* | integer | — |
| page | — | Page/serial number in the report (optional) |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_get_caseFetch one judgment by id.
section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the AI headnote (plain-language summary, the
laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply.
section='full' additionally returns the judgment body text (capped at ~40,000 chars; th…Fetch one judgment by id. section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the AI headnote (plain-language summary, the laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply. section='full' additionally returns the judgment body text (capped at ~40,000 chars; th…
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | Numeric judgment id (from a search/lookup/graph result) |
| section | — | 'summary' = metadata + AI headnote (cheap); 'full' = + judgment text |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_get_citationsWalk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites
(the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent
backward and forward until a research question is resolved.
Most useful on RECENT judgments: a 2024-25 case usually has nobod…Walk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites (the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent backward and forward until a research question is resolved. Most useful on RECENT judgments: a 2024-25 case usually has nobod…
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | Numeric judgment id |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_get_cited_byWalk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment
(how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first.
Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the case is still followed and
where the principle has been app…Walk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment (how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first. Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the case is still followed and where the principle has been app…
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | Numeric judgment id |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_most_citedList the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases
cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.List the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.
| Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
7 de 7 herramientas publicaron una descripción.
Los nombres y descripciones de las herramientas los escribe el publicador y se muestran literalmente como texto inerte. Son las cadenas que un cliente MCP pasa al modelo, así que Forge las analiza en busca de patrones de inyección de prompts — cualquier hallazgo aparece junto al análisis de seguridad de arriba. «Privilegiada» es una coincidencia de palabra clave en el nombre de la herramienta, no una auditoría de lo que hace: un nombre inofensivo puede hacer cualquier cosa.
Search 197,000+ Pakistani judgments by keyword, citation, or the legal question they settle.
Los nombres enlazados abren el índice de Forge con todas las entradas que se observó que exponen esa herramienta. Ver todas las herramientas indexadas.
Esta entrada no publica ningún paquete de npm, así que Forge no tiene un árbol de dependencias para ella. Es una carencia de cobertura, no una afirmación de que no tenga dependencias.