com.robinsaige/verifier

MCPcomunidaden línea
v0.1.0com.robinsaigeUnknownActualizado hace 1 m

MCP tool observatory: do registry servers answer, and are their answers true? No key.

Estado del endpointen línea
comprobado hace 16 h · 144 ms
100 % de las últimas 5 comprobaciones llegaron a este endpoint
Funciona en
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferido de los transportes que declara este listado (streamable-http). Que un cliente no aparezca aquí no significa que se haya descartado: simplemente Forge no puede confirmarlo.

Indexado automáticamente desde fuentes públicas. Aún sin verificar por su desarrollador en Forge.Reclamar este listado →
hace 1 mÚltima actualización
Paquete
Autorcom.robinsaige
LicenciaUnknown
Versión0.1.0
Fuentemcp-registry
Estado de confianza
B
60/100Bueno
✓Listado en el índice de Forge+10/10
—Identidad del publicador verificada+0/30
→ Publicador: este listado no tiene ningún repositorio registrado, así que `forge publish` no puede verificar la propiedad de forma automática. Usa «Reclamar este listado» arriba — en Forge lo revisamos a mano.
—Verificación de dominio+0/10
→ Ahora mismo no está disponible para este tipo de listado: hoy la comprobación de dominio solo se ejecuta para paquetes publicados en npm, así que esta fila todavía no se puede conseguir aquí, sea lo que sea lo que haya alojado en el dominio.
✓Análisis de inyección de prompts · limpio+30/30
✓Análisis de ofuscación / exfiltración · limpio+20/20
EstadoIndexado por la comunidad
PublicadorSin verificar
FirmaSin firmar
Dominio—
Procedencia—
DependenciasSin auditar
Superficie de herramientas8 herramientas · ninguna privilegiada
Análisis de seguridad✓ Limpiovlive · hoy¿Qué tan bien funciona este análisis?
EvaluacionesNinguna
Indexado14 ago 2026

La verificación confirma la identidad del publicador (la propiedad del repo), no la seguridad del código. El análisis de seguridad cubre los CVE conocidos y los scripts de instalación sospechosos.

Herramientas

8 herramientas · ninguna privilegiada
Observado en vivo desde el endpoint del proveedor16h ago

Leído de un handshake MCP real initialize → tools/list contra el endpoint declarado. No se invocó ninguna herramienta: tools/list es la llamada de introspección de solo lectura que el protocolo define para esto. Refleja lo que el servidor anunciaba en ese momento; un endpoint alojado no está fijado a ninguna versión y puede cambiar sin avisar.

  • https://robinsaige.com/mcp8 herramientas · 144 ms
registry_pulseCall this FIRST for the state of the MCP tool ecosystem in one shot: how many servers exist, how many actually answer a real handshake, how many are behind a login, the largest costume-farm concentration, AND the Tier-2 truth summary (how many server answers were re-derived against a public primary…

Call this FIRST for the state of the MCP tool ecosystem in one shot: how many servers exist, how many actually answer a real handshake, how many are behind a login, the largest costume-farm concentration, AND the Tier-2 truth summary (how many server answers were re-derived against a public primary…

No se publicó ningún esquema de entrada para esta herramienta.

should_i_useTHE GATE — call this before your agent depends on a tool you don't already trust. Give an exact server registry name and get a one-word verdict — allow / warn / block — with the reason, plus the full rating underneath. 'block' = dead/unreachable/costume-farm-shaped, don't depend on it; 'warn' = usa…

THE GATE — call this before your agent depends on a tool you don't already trust. Give an exact server registry name and get a one-word verdict — allow / warn / block — with the reason, plus the full rating underneath. 'block' = dead/unreachable/costume-farm-shaped, don't depend on it; 'warn' = usa…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
namestringexact registry name, e.g. io.github.you/your-mcp
namesarraybatch form: vet a whole config at session start (max 20)
find_toolsFind and RANK the trustworthy tool for a NEED. Describe the task in plain words ('screen a company for sanctions', 'US tariff data', 'vessel tracking') — the search is full-text over tool names AND their stored descriptions (stemmed, BM25-ranked), so your words need not appear in any tool's name. S…

Find and RANK the trustworthy tool for a NEED. Describe the task in plain words ('screen a company for sanctions', 'US tariff data', 'vessel tracking') — the search is full-text over tool names AND their stored descriptions (stemmed, BM25-ranked), so your words need not appear in any tool's name. S…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
need*stringwhat the tool should do, in plain words
verdictstringonly servers with this verdict
free_onlybooleanexclude servers that demand payment at the handshake
open_onlybooleanexclude auth-walled servers
max_latency_msintegeronly servers at or under this probe latency
naturestringonly servers whose dominant tool nature is this (see robinsaige.com/verification)
resolve_server_nameResolve a partial or misspelled server name to its EXACT registry id before calling should_i_use / check_server. Matches a fragment against registry NAMES only (not capabilities — for 'which tool does X' use find_tools). Returns candidate exact names with each one's latest liveness outcome. Empty q…

Resolve a partial or misspelled server name to its EXACT registry id before calling should_i_use / check_server. Matches a fragment against registry NAMES only (not capabilities — for 'which tool does X' use find_tools). Returns candidate exact names with each one's latest liveness outcome. Empty q…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
query*stringa fragment of a registry name, e.g. 'tariff'
check_serverThe FULL evidence behind the verdict for ONE server, by exact registry name — call should_i_use first for the one-word decision; call this when you want the whole record. Leads with the verdict (allow/warn/block), then the `rating` grouped as REACH (answers, latency vs population, protocol, auth),…

The FULL evidence behind the verdict for ONE server, by exact registry name — call should_i_use first for the one-word decision; call this when you want the whole record. Leads with the verdict (allow/warn/block), then the `rating` grouped as REACH (answers, latency vs population, protocol, auth),…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
name*stringexact registry name, e.g. io.github.you/your-mcp
report_callAFTER your agent calls a tool, fire-and-forget how it went — success/failure, latency, cost — so the observatory accumulates realized reliability (the one thing outside-in probing can't see: did it actually work for a real call). Anchored against our own probe: a 'worked' report on a server we saw…

AFTER your agent calls a tool, fire-and-forget how it went — success/failure, latency, cost — so the observatory accumulates realized reliability (the one thing outside-in probing can't see: did it actually work for a real call). Anchored against our own probe: a 'worked' report on a server we saw…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
server*stringexact registry name
toolstring—
okboolean—
latency_msinteger—
cost_tokensinteger—
call_hashstring—
changes_sinceWhat changed in the tool economy since a date: verdict flips, deaths, revivals, new servers, confirmed drift — the census diff as data. Poll this weekly to keep a local view current without re-crawling.

What changed in the tool economy since a date: verdict flips, deaths, revivals, new servers, confirmed drift — the census diff as data. Poll this weekly to keep a local view current without re-crawling.

ParámetroTipoDescripción
sincestringYYYY-MM-DD; omit for the whole latest diff
list_findingsThe observatory's ruled findings — each with its claim and its falsification test — plus the public corrections log (what we published, then corrected, never deleted). Call this to cite what has been established, or to see where we were wrong. No arguments.

The observatory's ruled findings — each with its claim and its falsification test — plus the public corrections log (what we published, then corrected, never deleted). Call this to cite what has been established, or to see where we were wrong. No arguments.

No se publicó ningún esquema de entrada para esta herramienta.

8 de 8 herramientas publicaron una descripción.

Los nombres y descripciones de las herramientas los escribe el publicador y se muestran literalmente como texto inerte. Son las cadenas que un cliente MCP pasa al modelo, así que Forge las analiza en busca de patrones de inyección de prompts — cualquier hallazgo aparece junto al análisis de seguridad de arriba. «Privilegiada» es una coincidencia de palabra clave en el nombre de la herramienta, no una auditoría de lo que hace: un nombre inofensivo puede hacer cualquier cosa.

Acerca de

MCP tool observatory: do registry servers answer, and are their answers true? No key.

Palabras clave
mcp
Alternativas
Comparando superficies de herramientas…

Sin cobertura de dependencias

Esta entrada no publica ningún paquete de npm, así que Forge no tiene un árbol de dependencias para ella. Es una carencia de cobertura, no una afirmación de que no tenga dependencias.