dev.realitygraph/verification-tools

MCPcomunidaden línea
v2.0.0dev.realitygraphUnknownActualizado hace 2 m

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Estado del endpointen línea
comprobado hace 7 días · 678 ms
100 % de las últimas 5 comprobaciones llegaron a este endpoint
Funciona en
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferido de los transportes que declara este listado (streamable-http). Que un cliente no aparezca aquí no significa que se haya descartado: simplemente Forge no puede confirmarlo.

Indexado automáticamente desde fuentes públicas. Aún sin verificar por su desarrollador en Forge.Reclamar este listado →
hace 2 mÚltima actualización
Paquete
Autordev.realitygraph
LicenciaUnknown
Versión2.0.0
Fuentemcp-registry
Estado de confianza
B
60/100Bueno
✓Listado en el índice de Forge+10/10
—Identidad del publicador verificada+0/30
→ Publicador: este listado no tiene ningún repositorio registrado, así que `forge publish` no puede verificar la propiedad de forma automática. Usa «Reclamar este listado» arriba — en Forge lo revisamos a mano.
—Verificación de dominio+0/10
→ Ahora mismo no está disponible para este tipo de listado: hoy la comprobación de dominio solo se ejecuta para paquetes publicados en npm, así que esta fila todavía no se puede conseguir aquí, sea lo que sea lo que haya alojado en el dominio.
✓Análisis de inyección de prompts · limpio+30/30
✓Análisis de ofuscación / exfiltración · limpio+20/20
EstadoIndexado por la comunidad
PublicadorSin verificar
FirmaSin firmar
Dominio—
Procedencia—
DependenciasSin auditar
Superficie de herramientas10 herramientas · ninguna privilegiada
Análisis de seguridad✓ Limpiovlive · hace 26 d¿Qué tan bien funciona este análisis?
EvaluacionesNinguna
Indexado3 jul 2026

La verificación confirma la identidad del publicador (la propiedad del repo), no la seguridad del código. El análisis de seguridad cubre los CVE conocidos y los scripts de instalación sospechosos.

Herramientas

10 herramientas · ninguna privilegiada
Observado en vivo desde el endpoint del proveedor26d ago

Leído de un handshake MCP real initialize → tools/list contra el endpoint declarado. No se invocó ninguna herramienta: tools/list es la llamada de introspección de solo lectura que el protocolo define para esto. Refleja lo que el servidor anunciaba en ese momento; un endpoint alojado no está fijado a ninguna versión y puede cambiar sin avisar.

  • https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp10 herramientas · 826 ms
check_verification_debtEstimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

Estimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
team_size*integerNumber of developers on the team (required)
ai_share_percentnumberShare of merges that are AI-assisted, in percent (default: 60, assumption)
prs_per_monthintegerTotal merged PRs per month (default: team_size x prs_per_engineer_per_month)
merged_loc_per_weeknumberMerged changed lines of code per week (enables the GVR and review-depth metrics)
reviewer_hours_per_weeknumberReviewer hours actually spent per week (enables the GVR metric)
substantive_review_comments_per_weeknumberSubstantive review comments per week, excluding bots and nitpicks (enables the review-depth metric)
ai_merges_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month (enables the unverified-merge rate)
ai_merges_with_evidence_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month with recorded validation evidence (enables the unverified-merge rate)
two_week_churn_percentnumberShare of new lines revised or reverted within 14 days, in percent. A warning signal in the metrics block; it never enters the cost model, because it measures l…
rework_rate_percentnumberShare of AI-assisted changes reworked for a defect within 14 days, in percent (default: 2, the illustrative rate from /cost-of-verification-debt - replace it w…
prs_per_engineer_per_monthnumberMerged PRs per engineer per month (default: 20, derived from the published worked report on /measure-verification-debt)
hourly_rate_eurnumberLoaded cost per engineer hour in EUR (default: 75, assumption)
hours_per_reworked_changenumberAverage hours per reworked change (default: 6, assumption)
review_reconstruction_hours_per_prnumberAverage reviewer hours spent reconstructing intent per AI-assisted PR (default: 0.5, assumption)
incident_allowance_eur_per_yearnumberAnnual incident allowance in EUR (default: 0; add one only when you have a locally defined incident class, frequency and expected-loss method)
langstringReport language (default: en)
lint_task_specCheck whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

Check whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
task*stringThe work order / task text you intend to give an AI coding agent (English or German)
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_task_contract_templateReturns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

Returns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
validate_task_contractDeterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

Deterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
contract*stringThe filled task contract as a JSON string (structure from get_task_contract_template, format='json')
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_verification_report_templateReturns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

Returns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
searchFull-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

Full-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

ParámetroTipoDescripción
query*stringSearch query (English or German)
langstringRestrict results to one language (default: both)
fetchFetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

Fetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

ParámetroTipoDescripción
id*stringDocument id from search results, or a realitygraph.dev URL
plan_change_verificationTurn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

Turn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

ParámetroTipoDescripción
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
check_release_readinessReturn GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

Return GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

ParámetroTipoDescripción
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
acceptance_criteria_passed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_failed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_not_run*integer—
checks*array—
rollback_ready*boolean—
monitoring_ready*boolean—
known_limitations_recorded*boolean—
independent_review*boolean—
calculate_verification_capacityCalculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

Calculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

ParámetroTipoDescripción
ai_changes_per_week*integer—
average_review_minutes_per_change*number—
available_reviewer_hours_per_week*number—
evidence_coverage_percent*number—
two_week_churn_percentnumber—
langstringResponse language (default: en)

10 de 10 herramientas publicaron una descripción.

Los nombres y descripciones de las herramientas los escribe el publicador y se muestran literalmente como texto inerte. Son las cadenas que un cliente MCP pasa al modelo, así que Forge las analiza en busca de patrones de inyección de prompts — cualquier hallazgo aparece junto al análisis de seguridad de arriba. «Privilegiada» es una coincidencia de palabra clave en el nombre de la herramienta, no una auditoría de lo que hace: un nombre inofensivo puede hacer cualquier cosa.

Acerca de

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Palabras clave
mcp
Alternativas
Comparando superficies de herramientas…

Sin cobertura de dependencias

Esta entrada no publica ningún paquete de npm, así que Forge no tiene un árbol de dependencias para ella. Es una carencia de cobertura, no una afirmación de que no tenga dependencias.