analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence

SKILLWorkflowcommunauté
v0.0.0seikaikyoMITMis à jour il y a 6 jSource →

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attributi

Community-submitted skill. Not yet reviewed by the Forge team. Full prompt content may not be available.Request review →
2Étoiles du dépôt
1Clients
1Formats
il y a 6 jDernière mise à jour
Skill
Auteurseikaikyo
Version0.0.0
LicenceMIT
CatégorieWorkflow
Formatsskill.md
PromptNon publié
Compatibilité
Claude✓ Pris en charge
Cursor
Copilot
ChatGPT
Gemini
À propos

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

Mots-clés
skillclaude