dev.realitygraph/verification-tools

MCPcommunautéen ligne
v2.0.0dev.realitygraphUnknownMis à jour il y a 2 mois

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

État de l’endpointen ligne
vérifié il y a 7 jours · 678 ms
100 % des dernières 5 vérifications ont atteint cet endpoint
Fonctionne dans
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Déduit des transports déclarés par cette annonce (streamable-http). Un client absent de cette liste n’est pas écarté pour autant — c’est simplement quelque chose que Forge ne peut pas confirmer.

Indexé automatiquement depuis des sources publiques. Pas encore vérifié par son développeur sur Forge.Revendiquer cette annonce →
il y a 2 moisDernière mise à jour
Paquet
Auteurdev.realitygraph
LicenceUnknown
Version2.0.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Statut de confiance
B
60/100Bon
✓Listé dans l’index Forge+10/10
—Identité de l’éditeur vérifiée+0/30
→ Éditeur : aucune référence de dépôt n’est enregistrée pour cette annonce, `forge publish` ne peut donc pas vérifier la propriété automatiquement. Utilisez « Revendiquer cette annonce » ci-dessus — Forge les examine à la main.
—Vérification de domaine+0/10
→ Actuellement indisponible pour ce type d’annonce — la vérification de domaine ne s’exécute aujourd’hui que pour les paquets adossés à npm, cette ligne ne peut donc pas encore être obtenue ici, quel que soit le contenu hébergé sur le domaine.
✓Analyse d’injection de prompt · propre+30/30
✓Analyse d’obfuscation / exfiltration · propre+20/20
StatutIndexé par la communauté
ÉditeurNon vérifié
SignatureNon signé
Domaine—
Provenance—
DépendancesNon audité
Surface d’outils10 outils · aucun privilégié
Analyse de sécurité✓ Proprevlive · il y a 26 jQuelle est l’efficacité de cette analyse ?
ÉvaluationsAucune
Indexé3 juil. 2026

La vérification confirme l’identité de l’éditeur (la propriété du dépôt), pas la sûreté du code. L’analyse de sécurité couvre les CVE connues et les scripts d’installation suspects.

Outils

10 outils · aucun privilégié
Observé en direct depuis l’endpoint du fournisseur26d ago

Lu depuis un véritable échange MCP initialize → tools/list contre l’endpoint déclaré. Aucun outil n’a été invoqué — tools/list est l’appel d’introspection en lecture seule que le protocole prévoit pour cela. Cela reflète ce que le serveur annonçait à cet instant ; un endpoint hébergé n’est figé sur aucune version et peut changer sans préavis.

  • https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp10 outils · 826 ms
check_verification_debtEstimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

Estimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

ParamètreTypeDescription
team_size*integerNumber of developers on the team (required)
ai_share_percentnumberShare of merges that are AI-assisted, in percent (default: 60, assumption)
prs_per_monthintegerTotal merged PRs per month (default: team_size x prs_per_engineer_per_month)
merged_loc_per_weeknumberMerged changed lines of code per week (enables the GVR and review-depth metrics)
reviewer_hours_per_weeknumberReviewer hours actually spent per week (enables the GVR metric)
substantive_review_comments_per_weeknumberSubstantive review comments per week, excluding bots and nitpicks (enables the review-depth metric)
ai_merges_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month (enables the unverified-merge rate)
ai_merges_with_evidence_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month with recorded validation evidence (enables the unverified-merge rate)
two_week_churn_percentnumberShare of new lines revised or reverted within 14 days, in percent. A warning signal in the metrics block; it never enters the cost model, because it measures l…
rework_rate_percentnumberShare of AI-assisted changes reworked for a defect within 14 days, in percent (default: 2, the illustrative rate from /cost-of-verification-debt - replace it w…
prs_per_engineer_per_monthnumberMerged PRs per engineer per month (default: 20, derived from the published worked report on /measure-verification-debt)
hourly_rate_eurnumberLoaded cost per engineer hour in EUR (default: 75, assumption)
hours_per_reworked_changenumberAverage hours per reworked change (default: 6, assumption)
review_reconstruction_hours_per_prnumberAverage reviewer hours spent reconstructing intent per AI-assisted PR (default: 0.5, assumption)
incident_allowance_eur_per_yearnumberAnnual incident allowance in EUR (default: 0; add one only when you have a locally defined incident class, frequency and expected-loss method)
langstringReport language (default: en)
lint_task_specCheck whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

Check whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

ParamètreTypeDescription
task*stringThe work order / task text you intend to give an AI coding agent (English or German)
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_task_contract_templateReturns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

Returns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

ParamètreTypeDescription
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
validate_task_contractDeterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

Deterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

ParamètreTypeDescription
contract*stringThe filled task contract as a JSON string (structure from get_task_contract_template, format='json')
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_verification_report_templateReturns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

Returns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

ParamètreTypeDescription
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
searchFull-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

Full-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

ParamètreTypeDescription
query*stringSearch query (English or German)
langstringRestrict results to one language (default: both)
fetchFetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

Fetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

ParamètreTypeDescription
id*stringDocument id from search results, or a realitygraph.dev URL
plan_change_verificationTurn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

Turn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

ParamètreTypeDescription
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
check_release_readinessReturn GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

Return GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

ParamètreTypeDescription
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
acceptance_criteria_passed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_failed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_not_run*integer—
checks*array—
rollback_ready*boolean—
monitoring_ready*boolean—
known_limitations_recorded*boolean—
independent_review*boolean—
calculate_verification_capacityCalculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

Calculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

ParamètreTypeDescription
ai_changes_per_week*integer—
average_review_minutes_per_change*number—
available_reviewer_hours_per_week*number—
evidence_coverage_percent*number—
two_week_churn_percentnumber—
langstringResponse language (default: en)

10 outils sur 10 ont publié une description.

Les noms et descriptions d’outils sont écrits par l’éditeur et affichés tels quels, comme du texte inerte. Ce sont les chaînes qu’un client MCP transmet à un modèle, alors Forge y recherche des motifs d’injection de prompt — tout constat apparaît avec l’analyse de sécurité ci-dessus. « Privilégié » est une correspondance de mot-clé sur le nom de l’outil, pas un audit de ce qu’il fait : un nom anodin peut tout de même tout faire.

À propos

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Mots-clés
mcp
Alternatives
Comparaison des surfaces d’outils…

Aucune couverture des dépendances

Cette entrée ne publie aucun paquet npm : Forge n'a donc pas d'arbre de dépendances pour elle. C'est une lacune de couverture — pas une affirmation qu'elle n'a aucune dépendance.