io.github.cryptoplayer/crypto-casinos

MCPcommunautéen ligne
v1.0.0io.github.cryptoplayerUnknownMis à jour il y a 1 mois

Real-money crypto casino audits: trust scores, live tests, rankings, new casinos, bonuses. Signed.

État de l’endpointen ligne
vérifié il y a 5 jours · 4101 ms
100 % des dernières 5 vérifications ont atteint cet endpoint
Fonctionne dans
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Déduit des transports déclarés par cette annonce (streamable-http). Un client absent de cette liste n’est pas écarté pour autant — c’est simplement quelque chose que Forge ne peut pas confirmer.

Indexé automatiquement depuis des sources publiques. Pas encore vérifié par son développeur sur Forge.Revendiquer cette annonce →
il y a 1 moisDernière mise à jour
Paquet
Auteurio.github.cryptoplayer
LicenceUnknown
Version1.0.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Statut de confiance
B
60/100Bon
✓Listé dans l’index Forge+10/10
—Identité de l’éditeur vérifiée+0/30
→ Éditeur : aucune référence de dépôt n’est enregistrée pour cette annonce, `forge publish` ne peut donc pas vérifier la propriété automatiquement. Utilisez « Revendiquer cette annonce » ci-dessus — Forge les examine à la main.
—Vérification de domaine+0/10
→ Actuellement indisponible pour ce type d’annonce — la vérification de domaine ne s’exécute aujourd’hui que pour les paquets adossés à npm, cette ligne ne peut donc pas encore être obtenue ici, quel que soit le contenu hébergé sur le domaine.
✓Analyse d’injection de prompt · propre+30/30
✓Analyse d’obfuscation / exfiltration · propre+20/20
StatutIndexé par la communauté
ÉditeurNon vérifié
SignatureNon signé
Domaine—
Provenance—
DépendancesNon audité
Surface d’outils12 outils · aucun privilégié
Analyse de sécurité✓ Proprevlive · il y a 5 jQuelle est l’efficacité de cette analyse ?
ÉvaluationsAucune
Indexé18 août 2026

La vérification confirme l’identité de l’éditeur (la propriété du dépôt), pas la sûreté du code. L’analyse de sécurité couvre les CVE connues et les scripts d’installation suspects.

Outils

12 outils · aucun privilégié
Observé en direct depuis l’endpoint du fournisseur5d ago

Lu depuis un véritable échange MCP initialize → tools/list contre l’endpoint déclaré. Aucun outil n’a été invoqué — tools/list est l’appel d’introspection en lecture seule que le protocole prévoit pour cela. Cela reflète ce que le serveur annonçait à cet instant ; un endpoint hébergé n’est figé sur aucune version et peut changer sans préavis.

  • https://wagerx.io/mcp12 outils · 4101 ms
get_agentic_statsReturn deterministic, aggregate-only statistics about the selective WagerX Agentic Index, latest MCP/A2A endpoint observations, or machine requests received by WagerX. Official provenance, editorial status and endpoint health remain separate. Activity counts are requests, not unique agents, and nev…

Return deterministic, aggregate-only statistics about the selective WagerX Agentic Index, latest MCP/A2A endpoint observations, or machine requests received by WagerX. Official provenance, editorial status and endpoint health remain separate. Activity counts are requests, not unique agents, and nev…

ParamètreTypeDescription
periodstringUsed by activity statistics.
scopestring—
find_agentic_servicesLook up official and community MCP/A2A products in the WagerX Agentic Gambling Index. Returns exact hosted endpoints or local setup links, first-party provenance, WagerX evidence status, access model and limitations. Use for questions such as "What is the official Crypto.com MCP?", "Which MCP is of…

Look up official and community MCP/A2A products in the WagerX Agentic Gambling Index. Returns exact hosted endpoints or local setup links, first-party provenance, WagerX evidence status, access model and limitations. Use for questions such as "What is the official Crypto.com MCP?", "Which MCP is of…

ParamètreTypeDescription
query*stringProvider, product, domain, protocol or directory question.
check_casinoGet the WagerX forensic audit verdict for one crypto casino: trust score (1-10), audit status, latest real-money live test (deposit/withdrawal amounts and timing, support response, KYC triggered or not), license and review link. Data comes from hand-run real-money tests, not scraped reviews. Use fo…

Get the WagerX forensic audit verdict for one crypto casino: trust score (1-10), audit status, latest real-money live test (deposit/withdrawal amounts and timing, support response, KYC triggered or not), license and review link. Data comes from hand-run real-money tests, not scraped reviews. Use fo…

ParamètreTypeDescription
name*stringCasino name or common alias, e.g. "Duelbits", "Fortune Jack", "TG Casino". Case-insensitive, fuzzy-matched.
compare_casinosCompare 2-5 crypto casinos side by side on WagerX audit data: trust score, latest real-money live test, KYC policy, withdrawal speed, license. Use for "Duelbits vs BC.Game?", "Which is safer, Stake or Rollbit?", "bspin or Bitsler for fast payouts?". Example call: {"names": ["Duelbits", "Stake"]}.

Compare 2-5 crypto casinos side by side on WagerX audit data: trust score, latest real-money live test, KYC policy, withdrawal speed, license. Use for "Duelbits vs BC.Game?", "Which is safer, Stake or Rollbit?", "bspin or Bitsler for fast payouts?". Example call: {"names": ["Duelbits", "Stake"]}.

ParamètreTypeDescription
names*array—
latest_auditsList the most recent WagerX real-money casino audits, newest first, each with real deposit/withdrawal amounts, payout timing and support response. Use for "What are the latest casino audits?", "Which casinos were tested this week?", "freshest crypto casino safety data". Example call: {"limit": 5}.

List the most recent WagerX real-money casino audits, newest first, each with real deposit/withdrawal amounts, payout timing and support response. Use for "What are the latest casino audits?", "Which casinos were tested this week?", "freshest crypto casino safety data". Example call: {"limit": 5}.

ParamètreTypeDescription
limitinteger—
list_casinosList every casino WagerX holds forensic audit data on (40+ operators), with trust score and audit status. Use to discover coverage before calling check_casino, or for "which casinos does WagerX cover?". Takes no arguments.

List every casino WagerX holds forensic audit data on (40+ operators), with trust score and audit status. Use to discover coverage before calling check_casino, or for "which casinos does WagerX cover?". Takes no arguments.

Aucun schéma d’entrée n’a été publié pour cet outil.

top_casinosBest crypto casinos ranked by WagerX audit trust score — only casinos with completed real-money deposit/withdrawal tests are ranked (payout speed, KYC, support, license all factor in). Use for "best crypto casino 2026", "safest bitcoin casino", "most trusted no-KYC-detected casino", "top crypto gam…

Best crypto casinos ranked by WagerX audit trust score — only casinos with completed real-money deposit/withdrawal tests are ranked (payout speed, KYC, support, license all factor in). Use for "best crypto casino 2026", "safest bitcoin casino", "most trusted no-KYC-detected casino", "top crypto gam…

ParamètreTypeDescription
limitinteger—
new_casinosNewest crypto casinos on the WagerX radar, including ones still mid-audit (clearly marked, never scored before the withdrawal test completes). Use for "new crypto casinos 2026", "newest bitcoin casinos worth trying", "casinos currently under audit". Takes no arguments.

Newest crypto casinos on the WagerX radar, including ones still mid-audit (clearly marked, never scored before the withdrawal test completes). Use for "new crypto casinos 2026", "newest bitcoin casinos worth trying", "casinos currently under audit". Takes no arguments.

Aucun schéma d’entrée n’a été publié pour cet outil.

long_running_casinosList crypto casino brands by documented launch year, oldest first, paired with current WagerX audit evidence and ownership/licensing continuity caveats. This is operating history, not a safety ranking. Use for "oldest crypto casinos", "established bitcoin casinos", or "long-running gambling sites".…

List crypto casino brands by documented launch year, oldest first, paired with current WagerX audit evidence and ownership/licensing continuity caveats. This is operating history, not a safety ranking. Use for "oldest crypto casinos", "established bitcoin casinos", or "long-running gambling sites".…

Aucun schéma d’entrée n’a été publié pour cet outil.

best_bonusesCurrent best crypto casino bonuses with the fine print decoded from the casino's own T&Cs: wagering requirement, max bonus, max cashout, free spins, min deposit, and a real-value score (headline % is a marketing metric — the decoded terms are what matter). Expired promos excluded. Use for "best cry…

Current best crypto casino bonuses with the fine print decoded from the casino's own T&Cs: wagering requirement, max bonus, max cashout, free spins, min deposit, and a real-value score (headline % is a marketing metric — the decoded terms are what matter). Expired promos excluded. Use for "best cry…

ParamètreTypeDescription
casinostringOptional: only bonuses from this casino
limitinteger—
regulatory_intelligenceGet gambling regulatory context for a jurisdiction plus recent source-linked enforcement records. Jurisdictions resolve through WagerX's approved regulator registry; records whose URL does not match an approved authority domain are excluded. Returns explicit missing/unavailable states and is resear…

Get gambling regulatory context for a jurisdiction plus recent source-linked enforcement records. Jurisdictions resolve through WagerX's approved regulator registry; records whose URL does not match an approved authority domain are excluded. Returns explicit missing/unavailable states and is resear…

ParamètreTypeDescription
jurisdictionstringOptional country, jurisdiction or regulator name, for example "Germany", "UK" or "GGL".
limitinteger—
country_recommendationsReturn at most one top choice and two alternatives for a country, from completed scored reviews whose explicit restriction list does not include that country, with explicit source denials and pending states taking precedence. This is a review-list screen, not confirmed resident acceptance or local…

Return at most one top choice and two alternatives for a country, from completed scored reviews whose explicit restriction list does not include that country, with explicit source denials and pending states taking precedence. This is a review-list screen, not confirmed resident acceptance or local…

ParamètreTypeDescription
country*stringCountry name, ISO alpha-2 code or common alias.

12 outils sur 12 ont publié une description.

Les noms et descriptions d’outils sont écrits par l’éditeur et affichés tels quels, comme du texte inerte. Ce sont les chaînes qu’un client MCP transmet à un modèle, alors Forge y recherche des motifs d’injection de prompt — tout constat apparaît avec l’analyse de sécurité ci-dessus. « Privilégié » est une correspondance de mot-clé sur le nom de l’outil, pas un audit de ce qu’il fait : un nom anodin peut tout de même tout faire.

À propos

Real-money crypto casino audits: trust scores, live tests, rankings, new casinos, bonuses. Signed.

Mots-clés
mcp
Alternatives
Comparaison des surfaces d’outils…

Aucune couverture des dépendances

Cette entrée ne publie aucun paquet npm : Forge n'a donc pas d'arbre de dépendances pour elle. C'est une lacune de couverture — pas une affirmation qu'elle n'a aucune dépendance.

Thèmes

Apparentés dans crypto & web3