scientific-critical-thinking

SKILLWorkflowcommunauté
v0.0.0K-Dense-AIMITMis à jour il y a 8 jSource →

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For for

Community-submitted skill. Not yet reviewed by the Forge team. Full prompt content may not be available.Request review →
2kÉtoiles du dépôt
1Clients
1Formats
il y a 8 jDernière mise à jour
Skill
AuteurK-Dense-AI
Version0.0.0
LicenceMIT
CatégorieWorkflow
Formatsskill.md
PromptOuvrir (voir l’onglet Prompt)
Compatibilité
Claude✓ Pris en charge
Cursor
Copilot
ChatGPT
Gemini
À propos

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

Mots-clés
skillclaude