@eclipsesource/review-guard-mcp

MCPattested
v0.3.0EclipseSourceMITUpdated 1mo agonpmGitHub

MCP server that lets agents work on GitHub PR reviews behind a safety boundary: pending (draft) reviews by default, submitting as an explicit opt-in

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Attested build
A verified provenance attestation binds this artifact to the listed repository. Nobody has claimed the listing yet — this proves where the code was built, not who stands behind it.
168Downloads/wk
1mo agoLast update
Package
AuthorEclipseSource
LicenseMIT
Version0.3.0
Sourcenpm+mcp-registry
Trust Status
A
85/100Trusted
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
✓Identity verified · attested build+20/20
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
✓npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+5/5
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Publisher: add the verified GitHub login to the npm package's maintainers (npm owner add <login>)
✓CVE scan · clean+30/30
✓Static analysis · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusIdentity verified
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance✓ Sigstore-verified · 44b2abc
Dependencies✓ 60 resolved+ · none vulnerable
Tool surface7 tools · 1 privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanv0.3.0 · 1mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedAug 15, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

7 tools · 1 privileged
Statically extracted from the published packagev0.3.0 · 1mo ago

Read out of the source npm actually ships, at scan time. The package was never executed. Tools registered dynamically at runtime, or hidden inside bundled or minified code, can be missed — so this is a floor on the tool surface, not a complete census of it.

get_pr_review_contextNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

list_pending_reviewNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

add_review_commentsNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

modify_review_commentNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

delete_pending_reviewprivilegedNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

submitNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

resolve_review_threadNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

0 of 7 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

MCP server that lets agents work on GitHub PR reviews behind a safety boundary: pending (draft) reviews by default, submitting as an explicit opt-in

Keywords
mcpmodel-context-protocolgithubpull-requestcode-reviewreviewai-agent
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This package was last scanned before Forge began storing the resolved tree. The next scan will record it.

Topics

Related in git & code hosting