# @martinloop/mcp

One system around coding agents to run, verify, recover, and hand off software work.

- **Type:** MCP server
- **Trust:** 60/100 (B), scored on the package rubric
- **Verification:** community-indexed — nobody has claimed this listing
- **Version:** 0.5.6
- **Author:** io.github.Keesan12
- **License:** Apache-2.0
- **npm:** @martinloop/mcp
- **Source:** https://github.com/Keesan12/martin-loop
- **Compatible clients:** claude-code, cursor, copilot, gemini (basis: transport)

## Trust

60/100 (B), scored on the package rubric
- Publisher verified: no
- Build provenance: verified attestation
- Install scripts: nothing suspicious found
- Prompt-injection scan: not run
- Obfuscation scan: not run
- Evidence age: 19 days

## Security scan

- **Status:** clean
- **Scanned:** 2026-08-09T13:39:21.035Z
- **Version scanned:** 0.3.9
- **CVEs:** none found by OSV at scan time

## Tools

40 declared. Statically extracted from the shipped source — a floor on the surface, not a census.
- `martin_start`
- `objective`
- `workingDirectory`
- `engine`
- `verificationPlan`
- `allowedPaths`
- `deniedPaths`
- `maxUsd`
- `maxIterations`
- `maxTokens`
- `martin_preflight`
- `martin_triage`
- `focus`
- `martin_resume`
- `loopId`
- `martin_prove`
- `martin_release_check`
- `martin_governed_coding_kickoff`
- `workspaceId`
- `projectId`
- `martin_debug_failed_run`
- `attemptIndex`
- `martin_publish_readiness_review`
- `martin_triage_run_store`
- `safe_bug_fix`
- `write_tests_first`
- `small_refactor`
- `security_review`
- `pr_review`
- `release_check`
- `martin_run_record`
- `martin_run_dossier_resource`
- `martin_run_attempt`
- `martin_run_verification`
- `martin_server_health`
- `martin_recent_runs`
- `martin_run_triage`
- `martin_latest_run`
- `martin_latest_summary`
- `martin_latest_receipt`

## Install

**Verdict: review** — Installable, but 1 thing to check first: No publisher has proved control of this listing; it is indexed, not vouched for.
**Cautions** (coverage gaps and advisories — never blocking)
- No publisher has proved control of this listing; it is indexed, not vouched for.
**Config** (claude-code):
```json
"{\n  \"mcpServers\": {\n    \"mcp\": {\n      \"command\": \"npx\",\n      \"args\": [\n        \"-y\",\n        \"@martinloop/mcp\"\n      ]\n    }\n  }\n}"
```

## Blast radius

Moderate to extensive — no credential declaration found, from the publisher, the upstream registry, or the README. Known so far: mutates data; runs on your machine.
- Floor 30, ceiling 54 (tier: unknown)
- `unknown` means the floor and ceiling land in different bands — not measured enough to name one. It does not mean low.
- This is impact, not likelihood. A high radius is not a defect: a filesystem server is supposed to write files. It is never part of the trust score.

## Machine-readable views of this entry

- Signed JSON: https://forgeregistry.com/api/v1/packages/%40martinloop%2Fmcp
- Install plan: https://forgeregistry.com/api/v1/packages/%40martinloop%2Fmcp/install-plan
- Alternatives: https://forgeregistry.com/api/v1/alternatives/%40martinloop%2Fmcp
- HTML page: https://forgeregistry.com/registry/%40martinloop%2Fmcp
- MCP: POST https://forgeregistry.com/api/mcp → `forge_get_package` / `forge_install_plan`

## About this document

Generated by Forge (https://forgeregistry.com) — a compact rendering of the same record served, signed, at the JSON URL above. Trust and scan facts are the registry's own measurements; anything Forge did not measure is named as unmeasured rather than omitted.