@nodegrove/vram-mcp

MCPcommunitylive
v1.0.0Nodegrove(MIT AND CC-BY-4.0)Updated 1d agonpmGitHub

MCP server: can this open LLM run on my GPU? VRAM, KV cache, speed ceilings and what would fit instead, with the exact math nodegrove.io uses. Any Hugging Face repo, any GPU.

Endpoint healthlive
checked 9h ago · 135ms
100% of the last 1 check reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio, streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
97Downloads/wk
1d agoLast update
Package
AuthorNodegrove
License(MIT AND CC-BY-4.0)
Version1.0.0
Sourcenpm+mcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/20
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
✓CVE scan · clean+30/30
✓Static analysis · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
Dependencies✓ 3 resolved · none vulnerable
Tool surface7 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanv1.0.0 · todayHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedOct 4, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

7 tools · none privileged
Statically extracted from the published packagev1.0.0 · 9h ago

Read out of the source npm actually ships, at scan time. The package was never executed. Tools registered dynamically at runtime, or hidden inside bundled or minified code, can be missed — so this is a floor on the tool surface, not a complete census of it.

nodegrove-vramNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

can_i_runCan this GPU run this open-weight LLM? Returns fits, tight or no, the memory split (weights, KV cache, overhead), a decode-speed ceiling, the longest context that fits and, on a no, every change that would make it fit: quantisation, KV cache, context, another card or a smaller model. Model: a name…

Can this GPU run this open-weight LLM? Returns fits, tight or no, the memory split (weights, KV cache, overhead), a decode-speed ceiling, the longest context that fits and, on a no, every change that would make it fit: quantisation, KV cache, context, another card or a smaller model. Model: a name…

No input schema was published for this tool.

what_fitsWhich open-weight LLMs fit this GPU: every model in list_models checked at one quantisation and context, with a recommended everyday model (the biggest class that fits with room for context at conversational speed), the largest that fits, the best at Q8 and the first out of reach. GPU: a name or id…

Which open-weight LLMs fit this GPU: every model in list_models checked at one quantisation and context, with a recommended everyday model (the biggest class that fits with room for context at conversational speed), the largest that fits, the best at Q8 and the first out of reach. GPU: a name or id…

No input schema was published for this tool.

estimate_vramHow much memory an LLM needs: weights + KV cache + overhead at each quantisation (or one), at a given context, and the smallest common card class that holds each. Model: a name or id from list_models, any Hugging Face repo id, or its architecture (params_b, layers, kv_heads, head_dim).

How much memory an LLM needs: weights + KV cache + overhead at each quantisation (or one), at a given context, and the smallest common card class that holds each. Model: a name or id from list_models, any Hugging Face repo id, or its architecture (params_b, layers, kv_heads, head_dim).

No input schema was published for this tool.

estimate_from_hf_repoReads any Hugging Face model repo's config.json and parameter count and estimates its memory: the attention layout found (standard, sliding-window, hybrid or latent), how much each 1,000 tokens of context costs, and weights + KV cache + overhead at every quantisation. For models nodegrove.io has no…

Reads any Hugging Face model repo's config.json and parameter count and estimates its memory: the attention layout found (standard, sliding-window, hybrid or latent), how much each 1,000 tokens of context costs, and weights + KV cache + overhead at every quantisation. For models nodegrove.io has no…

No input schema was published for this tool.

list_modelsNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

list_gpusThe GPUs and machines nodegrove.io covers: memory, the memory a runtime can use and bandwidth, from the makers' specs, with each one's page.

The GPUs and machines nodegrove.io covers: memory, the memory a runtime can use and bandwidth, from the makers' specs, with each one's page.

No input schema was published for this tool.

5 of 7 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

MCP server: can this open LLM run on my GPU? VRAM, KV cache, speed ceilings and what would fit instead, with the exact math nodegrove.io uses. Any Hugging Face repo, any GPU.

Keywords
mcpmodel-context-protocolmcp-serverllmvramgpulocal-llmhugging-facekv-cache
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

Dependency tree

What one Forge scan resolved from npm metadata on 2026-10-05 — observed resolution, not a publisher declaration.

3 packages resolved · 2 direct · none carrying advisories Resolution stops at depth 4 and 60 packages.