@readystack/denchoho-sakuin-check-2026

Name: @readystack/denchoho-sakuin-check-2026
Author: Unknown

MCPcommunity

v1.0.1UnknownSEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txtUpdated todaynpm GitHub

電子取引データの索引簿を12ルールで検査し、取引年月日・取引金額・取引先・ファイル名のうち検索要件を満たさない行と直し方を出します。同梱の12行サンプルでは6行・7件を指摘しました。

Works in

ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →

todayLast update

Package

AuthorUnknown

LicenseSEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txt

Version1.0.1

Sourcenpm+mcp-registry

npm@readystack/denchoho-sakuin-check-2026

GitHubjmshinhwa/readystack-themes

SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓

Trust Status

10/100Untrusted

✓Listed in Forge index+10/10

—Publisher identity verified+0/20

→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership

—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5

→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`

—Domain verification+0/5

→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }

—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5

→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo

—npm maintainer match+0/5

→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package

—CVE scan · not run+0/30

→ Not yet scanned — package must be on npm

—Static analysis · clean+0/20

→ Not yet scanned — package must be on npm

Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps

StatusCommunity-indexed

PublisherUnverified

SignatureUnsigned

Domain—

Provenance—

DependenciesNot audited

Tool surface—

Security scanNot runHow well does this scan work?

EvalsNone

IndexedSep 23, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

Not scanned yet

Forge has no scan on record for this entry, so it holds no observation of its tool surface. That is an absence of evidence, not evidence that it exposes no tools.

About

Keywords

電子帳簿保存法電帳法電子取引検索要件索引簿経理確定申告

Alternatives

Comparing tool surfaces…

@readystack/denchoho-sakuin-check-2026

Tools

No dependency coverage