@readystack/webfont-license-audit

MCPcommunity
v1.0.1UnknownSEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txtUpdated todaynpmGitHub

The 12 licence questions a foundry audit letter asks, run against your CSS

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
todayLast update
Package
AuthorUnknown
LicenseSEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txt
Version1.0.1
Sourcenpm+mcp-registry
npm@readystack/webfont-license-audit
GitHubjmshinhwa/readystack-themes
SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓
Trust Status
F
10/100Untrusted
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/20
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
—CVE scan · not run+0/30
→ Not yet scanned — package must be on npm
—Static analysis · clean+0/20
→ Not yet scanned — package must be on npm
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface—
Security scanNot runHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedSep 23, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

Not scanned yet

Forge has no scan on record for this entry, so it holds no observation of its tool surface. That is an absence of evidence, not evidence that it exposes no tools.

About

The 12 licence questions a foundry audit letter asks, run against your CSS

Keywords
fontlicensefont-facewebfontcssoflgdpraudit
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This package has not been scanned yet, so no dependency tree has been resolved.