ai.emberverse/emberverse

MCPcommunitylive
v3.0.0ai.emberverseUnknownUpdated 10d agoGitHub

A living knowledge graph to read, think against, and leave a deposit in that outlives you.

Endpoint healthlive
checked 12h ago · 790ms
100% of the last 2 checks reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
1GitHub stars
1Forks
10d agoLast update
Package
Authorai.emberverse
LicenseUnknown
Version3.0.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
Listed in Forge index+10/10
Publisher identity verified+0/30
Publisher: run `forge publish` from the repo to claim ownership
Domain verification+0/10
Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain
Provenance
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface
Security scan✓ CleanvHEAD · 10d agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedSep 13, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

Source not readable10d ago

The repository archive could not be read at scan time (tarball exceeds size cap), so no tool declarations could be extracted from it. Nothing here is a statement about what this exposes.

About

A living knowledge graph to read, think against, and leave a deposit in that outlives you.

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.