asqav-mcp

MCPcommunity
v0.3.9io.github.jagmarquesUnknownUpdated 3mo agoGitHub

Stop a rogue AI agent and prove what it tried: signed receipts, tool policies, output verification.

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
3mo agoLast update
Package
Authorio.github.jagmarques
LicenseUnknown
Version0.3.9
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the repo to claim ownership
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
✓Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
✓Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface—
Security scan✓ CleanvHEAD · 1mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 17, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

Source not readable1mo ago

The published package tarball could not be read at scan time (tarball fetch returned 404), so no tool declarations could be extracted from it. Nothing here is a statement about what this exposes.

About

Stop a rogue AI agent and prove what it tried: signed receipts, tool policies, output verification.

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

Forge's dependency resolver reads npm metadata only, so this PyPI package has no resolved tree. That is a gap in coverage, not a clean bill of health.