com.beauticslab/mcp

MCPcommunitylive
v1.0.1com.beauticslabUnknownUpdated 4mo agoGitHub

Search Korean cosmetics from Olive Young, Daiso, Naver, Coupang, 11st with EWG ingredient analysis.

"내 루틴에 자극 성분 있어?" Claude한테 물어보세요. 올리브영·다이소·이커머스(네이버, 쿠팡, 11번가 등) 카탈로그와 BeauticsLab에 등록한 내 루틴을, 내가 쓰는 AI 안에서 그대로 분석합니다. 제품 검색, 루틴 조회, 전성분 분석까지. 서비스: beauticslab.com · English · Smithery Claude Code에서 비타민C 세럼 추천 → 내 루틴 조회 → 겹치는 제품 확인까지 한 대화로. (고화질 영상) 연결: AI 도구의 "Custom Connector / MCP Server 추가"에 위 주소 입력 → BeauticsLab 계정 로그인 → 권한 허용 계정: beauticslab.com Google / Kakao 로그인 계정 그대로 내가 쓰는 AI한테 그냥 말 걸면…

Endpoint healthlive
checked 11 days ago · 206ms · auth required
100% of the last 5 checks reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
4mo agoLast update
Package
Authorcom.beauticslab
LicenseUnknown
Version1.0.1
Sourcemcp-registry
GitHubwebsfactory/beauticslab-mcp
SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the repo to claim ownership
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
✓Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
✓Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface3 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ CleanvHEAD · 3mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 13, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

3 tools · none privileged
Statically extracted from the published packagevHEAD · 3mo ago

Read out of the source npm actually ships, at scan time. The package was never executed. Tools registered dynamically at runtime, or hidden inside bundled or minified code, can be missed — so this is a floor on the tool surface, not a complete census of it.

get_my_routineNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

get_product_ingredientsNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

search_productNo description published

This tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.

0 of 3 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

"내 루틴에 자극 성분 있어?" Claude한테 물어보세요. 올리브영·다이소·이커머스(네이버, 쿠팡, 11번가 등) 카탈로그와 BeauticsLab에 등록한 내 루틴을, 내가 쓰는 AI 안에서 그대로 분석합니다. 제품 검색, 루틴 조회, 전성분 분석까지. 서비스: beauticslab.com · English · Smithery Claude Code에서 비타민C 세럼 추천 → 내 루틴 조회 → 겹치는 제품 확인까지 한 대화로. (고화질 영상) 연결: AI 도구의 "Custom Connector / MCP Server 추가"에 위 주소 입력 → BeauticsLab 계정 로그인 → 권한 허용 계정: beauticslab.com Google / Kakao 로그인 계정 그대로 내가 쓰는 AI한테 그냥 말 걸면 됩니다. 🔍 "건성인데 알코올 없는 토너 추천해줘" → 올리브영·다이소·이커머스(네이버, 쿠팡, 11번가 등) + BeauticsLab 검증 카탈로그에서 검색 📋 "내 저녁…

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

Tools exposed

3 tools · none privileged · observed by static extraction. A tool surface is what one scan read on one day, not a live capability list.

Linked names open Forge’s index of every entry observed exposing that tool. Browse all indexed tools.

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.