com.ediscoverydecoder/mcp

MCPcommunitylive
v0.1.0com.ediscoverydecoderUnknownUpdated 3mo ago

Free educational MCP for read-only eDiscovery news and TAR/review calculators.

Endpoint healthlive
checked 10 days ago · 198ms
100% of the last 5 checks reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
3mo agoLast update
Package
Authorcom.ediscoverydecoder
LicenseUnknown
Version0.1.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: this listing has no repository on file, so `forge publish` cannot verify ownership automatically. Use "Claim this listing" above — Forge reviews these by hand.
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
✓Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
✓Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface15 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanvlive · 29d agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 23, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

15 tools · none privileged
Observed live from the vendor's endpoint29d ago

Read from a real MCP initialize → tools/list handshake against the declared endpoint. No tool was ever invoked — tools/list is the read-only introspection call the protocol defines for this. It reflects what the server advertised at that moment; a hosted endpoint is not pinned to any version and can change without notice.

  • https://mcp.ediscoverydecoder.com/mcp15 tools · 199ms
pingHealth check: confirm the eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc MCP server is reachable before a demo or when troubleshooting a connection. Returns server name and version. No inputs.

Health check: confirm the eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc MCP server is reachable before a demo or when troubleshooting a connection. Returns server name and version. No inputs.

No input schema was published for this tool.

list_capabilitiesList the full eDiscovery Decoder MCP surface — every tool, prompt, and resource, plus the suggested demo flow and safety boundaries — with an example prompt for each. Call this first when you are unsure which tool fits the user's question, or when tool-search shows only a partial list.

List the full eDiscovery Decoder MCP surface — every tool, prompt, and resource, plus the suggested demo flow and safety boundaries — with an example prompt for each. Call this first when you are unsure which tool fits the user's question, or when tool-search shows only a partial list.

No input schema was published for this tool.

get_demo_guideReturn a short, human-readable walkthrough for testing this server: the endpoint, the tool/prompt/resource names, and ready-to-paste sample prompts. Use to give someone a guided demo. For the full machine-readable capability catalog, use list_capabilities instead.

Return a short, human-readable walkthrough for testing this server: the endpoint, the tool/prompt/resource names, and ready-to-paste sample prompts. Use to give someone a guided demo. For the full machine-readable capability catalog, use list_capabilities instead.

No input schema was published for this tool.

get_resource_contentFetch the JSON behind a supported edd:// resource — the demo guide, TAR learning path, glossary, or news (latest / brief / by-date). Use when you want resource content but the client cannot read MCP resources directly, e.g. to pull glossary definitions or the news brief as a normal tool result.

Fetch the JSON behind a supported edd:// resource — the demo guide, TAR learning path, glossary, or news (latest / brief / by-date). Use when you want resource content but the client cannot read MCP resources directly, e.g. to pull glossary definitions or the news brief as a normal tool result.

ParameterTypeDescription
uri*string—
get_prompt_templateReturn the rendered text of one of this server's guided prompts (mcp-demo-tour, tar-matter-kickoff, weekly-digest). Use when the client can call tools but cannot open MCP prompts directly, or when you want to inspect a prompt's wording before using it.

Return the rendered text of one of this server's guided prompts (mcp-demo-tour, tar-matter-kickoff, weekly-digest). Use when the client can call tools but cannot open MCP prompts directly, or when you want to inspect a prompt's wording before using it.

ParameterTypeDescription
prompt_name*string—
audiencestring—
matter_descriptionstring—
week_startstring—
search_newsFind recent eDiscovery / legal-AI / TAR news by topic, tag, or date range. Use when the user asks what's new or recent in eDiscovery, wants stories on a subject, or asks about a time window. For a ready-made top-stories roundup instead, use get_news_brief.

Find recent eDiscovery / legal-AI / TAR news by topic, tag, or date range. Use when the user asks what's new or recent in eDiscovery, wants stories on a subject, or asks about a time window. For a ready-made top-stories roundup instead, use get_news_brief.

ParameterTypeDescription
querystring—
tagsarray—
date_fromstring—
date_to——
limitinteger—
get_news_briefGet the current eDiscovery Decoder news brief: top stories plus a Week in Review breakdown, returned both as structured data and as display-ready Markdown (formatted_brief) with a 'why it matters' line per story. Use when the user wants a roundup or summary of current eDiscovery AI news rather than…

Get the current eDiscovery Decoder news brief: top stories plus a Week in Review breakdown, returned both as structured data and as display-ready Markdown (formatted_brief) with a 'why it matters' line per story. Use when the user wants a roundup or summary of current eDiscovery AI news rather than…

ParameterTypeDescription
current_limitinteger—
week_limitinteger—
calculate_review_metricsScore a coded sample when you have a full confusion matrix (true/false positives and negatives) — e.g. comparing a TAR model's calls against a reviewer's. Returns recall, precision, F1, accuracy, and in-sample elusion. Use calculate_control_set_recall if you only have relevant-found vs relevant-mis…

Score a coded sample when you have a full confusion matrix (true/false positives and negatives) — e.g. comparing a TAR model's calls against a reviewer's. Returns recall, precision, F1, accuracy, and in-sample elusion. Use calculate_control_set_recall if you only have relevant-found vs relevant-mis…

ParameterTypeDescription
true_positives*integer—
false_positives*integer—
false_negatives*integer—
true_negatives*integer—
calculate_elusionEstimate how much responsive/relevant material may remain in a set you chose NOT to review (the discard, null, or 'elusion' set). Use when a random sample of that excluded set has been coded — e.g. 'we sampled 400 culled docs and found 2 relevant.' Returns the elusion rate and a Wilson confidence i…

Estimate how much responsive/relevant material may remain in a set you chose NOT to review (the discard, null, or 'elusion' set). Use when a random sample of that excluded set has been coded — e.g. 'we sampled 400 culled docs and found 2 relevant.' Returns the elusion rate and a Wilson confidence i…

ParameterTypeDescription
relevant_found_in_sample*integer—
sample_size*integer—
confidence_levelnumber—
calculate_sample_sizeWork out how many documents to randomly sample to estimate a proportion (e.g. richness or elusion) at a target confidence level and margin of error, with finite-population correction. Use when planning a sample before review — 'how big a sample do we need?' Aggregate inputs only; not legal advice.

Work out how many documents to randomly sample to estimate a proportion (e.g. richness or elusion) at a target confidence level and margin of error, with finite-population correction. Use when planning a sample before review — 'how big a sample do we need?' Aggregate inputs only; not legal advice.

ParameterTypeDescription
population_size*integer—
confidence_levelnumber—
margin_of_error*number—
estimated_prevalencenumber—
calculate_tar_recall_estimateEstimate overall TAR recall and how many responsive docs were missed, by combining the responsive count already found with an elusion sample of the excluded set. Use when the user wants a recall % for the whole workflow, not just the elusion rate. For only the elusion rate and its interval, use cal…

Estimate overall TAR recall and how many responsive docs were missed, by combining the responsive count already found with an elusion sample of the excluded set. Use when the user wants a recall % for the whole workflow, not just the elusion rate. For only the elusion rate and its interval, use cal…

ParameterTypeDescription
responsive_found*integer—
excluded_population_size*integer—
elusion_responsive_hits*integer—
elusion_sample_size*integer—
confidence_levelnumber—
calculate_prevalence_richnessEstimate how rich or prevalent a population is — the share that is responsive/relevant/positive — from positive hits in a random sample, with a Wilson confidence interval. Use for 'what % of this set is relevant?' or to size review scope and cost expectations. Aggregate counts only; not legal advic…

Estimate how rich or prevalent a population is — the share that is responsive/relevant/positive — from positive hits in a random sample, with a Wilson confidence interval. Use for 'what % of this set is relevant?' or to size review scope and cost expectations. Aggregate counts only; not legal advic…

ParameterTypeDescription
positive_hits*integer—
sample_size*integer—
population_sizeinteger—
confidence_levelnumber—
calculate_control_set_recallCalculate recall against a known control set: the share of documents already confirmed relevant that the workflow found, with a Wilson confidence interval. Use when you have relevant-found and relevant-missed counts from a fixed reference set. For recall from a confusion matrix use calculate_review…

Calculate recall against a known control set: the share of documents already confirmed relevant that the workflow found, with a Wilson confidence interval. Use when you have relevant-found and relevant-missed counts from a fixed reference set. For recall from a confusion matrix use calculate_review…

ParameterTypeDescription
relevant_found*integer—
relevant_missed*integer—
confidence_levelnumber—
compare_tar_cutoffsCompare candidate TAR score or rank cutoffs side by side: for each cutoff, how many docs sit above it, its share of the scored set, and (if responsive counts are given) an estimated precision. Use when deciding where to draw the review/cull line. Aggregate counts only; not legal advice.

Compare candidate TAR score or rank cutoffs side by side: for each cutoff, how many docs sit above it, its share of the scored set, and (if responsive counts are given) an estimated precision. Use when deciding where to draw the review/cull line. Aggregate counts only; not legal advice.

ParameterTypeDescription
scored_document_count*integer—
cutoffs*array—
validate_sample_designQC a TAR validation sampling plan: check whether it has the documented elements needed for a defensibility discussion (population, sample size, confidence level, sampling frame/method, randomization, etc.) and flag what is missing or inconsistent. Use to sanity-check a sampling protocol before rely…

QC a TAR validation sampling plan: check whether it has the documented elements needed for a defensibility discussion (population, sample size, confidence level, sampling frame/method, randomization, etc.) and flag what is missing or inconsistent. Use to sanity-check a sampling protocol before rely…

ParameterTypeDescription
population_size*integer—
sample_size*integer—
confidence_levelnumber—
margin_of_errornumber—
sampling_framestring—
sampling_methodstring—
random_seedstring—
generated_atstring—
excluded_population_sizeinteger—

15 of 15 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

Free educational MCP for read-only eDiscovery news and TAR/review calculators.

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.