com.mactechsolutionsllc.www/cmmc

MCPcommunitylive
v1.2.0com.mactechsolutionsllc.wwwUnknownUpdated 1mo ago

NIST 800-171 controls and 800-171A objectives, crosswalks, exact SPRS scoring, POA&M generation.

Endpoint healthlive
checked 1 day ago · 408ms
100% of the last 5 checks reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
1mo agoLast update
Package
Authorcom.mactechsolutionsllc.www
LicenseUnknown
Version1.2.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: this listing has no repository on file, so `forge publish` cannot verify ownership automatically. Use "Claim this listing" above — Forge reviews these by hand.
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
✓Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
✓Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface13 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanvlive · 12d agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedAug 11, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

13 tools · none privileged
Observed live from the vendor's endpoint12d ago

Read from a real MCP initialize → tools/list handshake against the declared endpoint. No tool was ever invoked — tools/list is the read-only introspection call the protocol defines for this. It reflects what the server advertised at that moment; a hosted endpoint is not pinned to any version and can change without notice.

  • https://www.mactechsolutionsllc.com/api/mcp13 tools · 424ms
lookup_controlGet one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirement by number (e.g. "3.5.3"): the full requirement text, its control family, and its exact DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) point weight, including the sliding-scale rules for 3.5.3 (MFA) and 3.13.11 (FIPS cryptography). Call this when the user asks w…

Get one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirement by number (e.g. "3.5.3"): the full requirement text, its control family, and its exact DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) point weight, including the sliding-scale rules for 3.5.3 (MFA) and 3.13.11 (FIPS cryptography). Call this when the user asks w…

ParameterTypeDescription
control*stringControl number, e.g. "3.1.1" or "3.13.11"
sectionsarrayExtra views to include: "objectives" for the 800-171A assessment objectives (how an assessor tests it), "crosswalk" for the 800-53 / CSF 2.0 / SOC 2 mappings.…
list_controlsList NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements with their DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) weights, optionally filtered by control family name or by point weight (5, 3, or 1). Call this to enumerate the 110 CMMC Level 2 controls, to find all 5-point (highest-impact) requirements, or to see everything in…

List NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements with their DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) weights, optionally filtered by control family name or by point weight (5, 3, or 1). Call this to enumerate the 110 CMMC Level 2 controls, to find all 5-point (highest-impact) requirements, or to see everything in…

ParameterTypeDescription
familystringFilter by control family
weight—Filter by DoD assessment point weight
verbosebooleanInclude the full requirement text for every result. Off by default: an unfiltered verbose listing is ~25× larger and is rarely what the question needs.
calculate_sprs_scoreCompute an exact SPRS score per the DoD Assessment Methodology: start at 110 and subtract each unimplemented requirement's Annex A weight (floor −203). Pass the control numbers that are NOT implemented; optionally pass 3.5.3 and/or 3.13.11 as partially implemented for their sliding-scale values (MF…

Compute an exact SPRS score per the DoD Assessment Methodology: start at 110 and subtract each unimplemented requirement's Annex A weight (floor −203). Pass the control numbers that are NOT implemented; optionally pass 3.5.3 and/or 3.13.11 as partially implemented for their sliding-scale values (MF…

ParameterTypeDescription
not_implemented*arrayRev 2 control numbers not implemented, e.g. ["3.5.3", "3.11.2"]. An empty array means all 110 implemented (score 110). Rev 3 identifiers are rejected - there i…
partially_implementedarraySliding-scale controls at their partial value: 3.5.3 (MFA for privileged and remote users only) and/or 3.13.11 (encryption employed but not FIPS-validated). De…
get_assessment_objectivesGet the official NIST SP 800-171A assessment objectives for one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirement - the exact "Determine if..." objectives a CMMC Level 2 assessor scores, plus the potential assessment methods (what an assessor examines, who they interview, what they test). Call this when the user a…

Get the official NIST SP 800-171A assessment objectives for one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirement - the exact "Determine if..." objectives a CMMC Level 2 assessor scores, plus the potential assessment methods (what an assessor examines, who they interview, what they test). Call this when the user a…

ParameterTypeDescription
control*stringControl number, e.g. "3.5.3"
crosswalk_controlMap a security control across frameworks: NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 ↔ NIST SP 800-53 (FedRAMP Moderate) ↔ NIST CSF 2.0 ↔ SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. Accepts an 800-171 number ("3.5.3"), an 800-53 id ("AC-2"), a CSF category ("PR.AA" style / "GV.RM"), or a SOC 2 criterion ("CC6"). Call this when the…

Map a security control across frameworks: NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 ↔ NIST SP 800-53 (FedRAMP Moderate) ↔ NIST CSF 2.0 ↔ SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. Accepts an 800-171 number ("3.5.3"), an 800-53 id ("AC-2"), a CSF category ("PR.AA" style / "GV.RM"), or a SOC 2 criterion ("CC6"). Call this when the…

ParameterTypeDescription
control*stringA control id from any supported framework, e.g. "3.1.1", "AC-2", "GV.RM", or "CC6"
determine_cmmc_levelDetermine which CMMC level (1, 2, or 3) applies to a defense contractor based on the data they handle and the clauses in their contracts, and - separately - which assessment type may actually be designated today. Those are not the same question: CMMC Phase II was suspended on 13 July 2026, so C3PAO…

Determine which CMMC level (1, 2, or 3) applies to a defense contractor based on the data they handle and the clauses in their contracts, and - separately - which assessment type may actually be designated today. Those are not the same question: CMMC Phase II was suspended on 13 July 2026, so C3PAO…

ParameterTypeDescription
handles_cui*stringDoes the organization store, process, or transmit Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) - e.g. technical data, drawings, specs above general descriptive ma…
contract_clausesarrayFAR/DFARS clauses present in their contracts, if known
list_level1_practicesList all 17 CMMC Level 1 basic safeguarding practices with their FAR 52.204-21 clause citations - the complete requirement set for contractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) only. Call this when the user asks what CMMC Level 1 requires.

List all 17 CMMC Level 1 basic safeguarding practices with their FAR 52.204-21 clause citations - the complete requirement set for contractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) only. Call this when the user asks what CMMC Level 1 requires.

No input schema was published for this tool.

generate_poam_entriesTurn a list of unimplemented NIST SP 800-171 controls into structured Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) entries, and - the part that decides whether the plan is usable - sort them by eligibility under 32 CFR 170.21. Most gaps CANNOT go on a CMMC Level 2 POA&M: the rule bars every requirement wort…

Turn a list of unimplemented NIST SP 800-171 controls into structured Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) entries, and - the part that decides whether the plan is usable - sort them by eligibility under 32 CFR 170.21. Most gaps CANNOT go on a CMMC Level 2 POA&M: the rule bars every requirement wort…

ParameterTypeDescription
gaps*arrayThe unimplemented or partially implemented controls
conditionalStatusDatestringConditional CMMC Status Date (YYYY-MM-DD), if one exists. The 180-day closeout window runs from this date - NOT from the day the plan is written - so without i…
check_contract_type_eligibilityDetermine whether a contractor can legally be awarded a given contract type, based on the business systems that type requires. A cost-reimbursement contract may be awarded only if the accounting system is adequate for determining costs (FAR 16.301-3), and T&M billing cannot be substantiated without…

Determine whether a contractor can legally be awarded a given contract type, based on the business systems that type requires. A cost-reimbursement contract may be awarded only if the accounting system is adequate for determining costs (FAR 16.301-3), and T&M billing cannot be substantiated without…

ParameterTypeDescription
contract_typestringThe contract type named in the solicitation. Omit to compare all types.
include_sf1408booleanInclude the SF1408 pre-award accounting system survey criteria.
lookup_clauseExplain what a FAR or DFARS cybersecurity clause obliges a contractor to do: what triggers it, the concrete duties, the reporting deadlines, what it flows down to subcontractors, and which other clauses come with it. Covers 52.204-21, 252.204-7008, 252.204-7012, 252.204-7019, 252.204-7020, 252.204-…

Explain what a FAR or DFARS cybersecurity clause obliges a contractor to do: what triggers it, the concrete duties, the reporting deadlines, what it flows down to subcontractors, and which other clauses come with it. Covers 52.204-21, 252.204-7008, 252.204-7012, 252.204-7019, 252.204-7020, 252.204-…

ParameterTypeDescription
clausestringClause number - "7012", "252.204-7012", or "DFARS 252.204-7012" all work. Omit to list every clause covered.
scope_assessmentWork out which assets fall inside a CMMC assessment boundary, and what each category obliges. Returns the DoD asset categories (CUI Asset, Security Protection Asset, Contractor Risk Managed Asset, Specialized Asset, Out-of-Scope) with how each is treated at assessment, plus the CUI categories that…

Work out which assets fall inside a CMMC assessment boundary, and what each category obliges. Returns the DoD asset categories (CUI Asset, Security Protection Asset, Contractor Risk Managed Asset, Specialized Asset, Out-of-Scope) with how each is treated at assessment, plus the CUI categories that…

ParameterTypeDescription
level*—CMMC level being scoped. Level 1 has no asset taxonomy - everything touching FCI is in scope.
include_cui_categoriesbooleanInclude the common CUI categories and the traps that hide them. Useful when the contractor is unsure whether they hold CUI at all.
lookup_rev3_requirementGet one NIST SP 800-171 REVISION 3 requirement by its zero-padded number (e.g. "03.01.01"): the requirement statement, its organization-defined parameters, the 800-171A Rev 3 assessment objectives, and whether it was withdrawn. Rev 3 has 97 active requirements of 130 numbered across 17 families, wi…

Get one NIST SP 800-171 REVISION 3 requirement by its zero-padded number (e.g. "03.01.01"): the requirement statement, its organization-defined parameters, the 800-171A Rev 3 assessment objectives, and whether it was withdrawn. Rev 3 has 97 active requirements of 130 numbered across 17 families, wi…

ParameterTypeDescription
requirement*stringRev 3 requirement number, e.g. "03.01.01" or "3.1.1" (zero-padded automatically). This is a Rev 3 identifier - it is NOT the same requirement as the Rev 2 cont…
crosswalk_revisionsExplain how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and Rev 3 differ, and what happened to a specific requirement between them. Call this when someone is implementing Rev 3 early, holds a Rev 3 citation and needs the Rev 2 obligation, or asks which revision applies to them. Answers the question DoD guidance forces o…

Explain how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and Rev 3 differ, and what happened to a specific requirement between them. Call this when someone is implementing Rev 3 early, holds a Rev 3 citation and needs the Rev 2 obligation, or asks which revision applies to them. Answers the question DoD guidance forces o…

ParameterTypeDescription
requirementstringOptional: a specific requirement in either scheme, e.g. "3.5.3" (Rev 2) or "03.05.03" (Rev 3). Omit for the structural summary alone.

13 of 13 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

NIST 800-171 controls and 800-171A objectives, crosswalks, exact SPRS scoring, POA&M generation.

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.