Search 197,000+ Pakistani judgments by keyword, citation, or the legal question they settle.
Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.
Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.
Read from a real MCP initialize → tools/list handshake against the declared endpoint. No tool was ever invoked — tools/list is the read-only introspection call the protocol defines for this. It reflects what the server advertised at that moment; a hosted endpoint is not pinned to any version and can change without notice.
https://pakistancaselaw.com/mcp7 tools · 966mscaselaw_searchFull-text search of Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court & High Courts, 1970 onward).
Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to the legal point decides which cases are
returned; among comparably-near cases, more senior court > larger bench > more recent >
more cited. Use sort='newest' whe…Full-text search of Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court & High Courts, 1970 onward). Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to the legal point decides which cases are returned; among comparably-near cases, more senior court > larger bench > more recent > more cited. Use sort='newest' whe…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| query* | string | Keywords, e.g. 'bail murder 302' or 'khula dower' |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| sort | string | relevance (default: nearest on the point, then court/bench/recency/citations) | newest (latest law first — useful because amendments supersede) | court (most s… |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_search_questionsFind judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain.
Every AI summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g.
"Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused to bail?" This searches those
questions, so it matches the shap…Find judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain. Every AI summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g. "Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused to bail?" This searches those questions, so it matches the shap…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| query* | string | The legal question or its subject, in the words a judgment would use — 'delay in lodging FIR', 'concurrent findings of fact', 'pre-arrest bail murder' |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_lookup_citationFind the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation.
Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34.
Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape
as caselaw_search.Find the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation. Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34. Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape as caselaw_search.
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| journal* | string | Law-report code, e.g. 'PLD', 'SCMR', 'CLC' |
| year* | integer | — |
| page | — | Page/serial number in the report (optional) |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_get_caseFetch one judgment by id.
section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the AI headnote (plain-language summary, the
laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply.
section='full' additionally returns the judgment body text (capped at ~40,000 chars; th…Fetch one judgment by id. section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the AI headnote (plain-language summary, the laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply. section='full' additionally returns the judgment body text (capped at ~40,000 chars; th…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | Numeric judgment id (from a search/lookup/graph result) |
| section | — | 'summary' = metadata + AI headnote (cheap); 'full' = + judgment text |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_get_citationsWalk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites
(the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent
backward and forward until a research question is resolved.
Most useful on RECENT judgments: a 2024-25 case usually has nobod…Walk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites (the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent backward and forward until a research question is resolved. Most useful on RECENT judgments: a 2024-25 case usually has nobod…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | Numeric judgment id |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_get_cited_byWalk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment
(how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first.
Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the case is still followed and
where the principle has been app…Walk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment (how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first. Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the case is still followed and where the principle has been app…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | Numeric judgment id |
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
caselaw_most_citedList the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases
cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.List the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | — |
| offset | integer | — |
| response_format | — | — |
7 of 7 tools published a description.
Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.
Search 197,000+ Pakistani judgments by keyword, citation, or the legal question they settle.
Linked names open Forge’s index of every entry observed exposing that tool. Browse all indexed tools.
This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.