defiguard-mcp

MCPcommunity
v0.1.1Quantum ShieldMITUpdated 6mo agonpmGitHub

DeFiGuard MCP Server - DeFi protocol risk analysis tools for AI coding agents. Analyze token contracts, detect rug pull patterns, check DeFi composability risks.

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
31Downloads/wk
6mo agoLast update
Package
AuthorQuantum Shield
LicenseMIT
Version0.1.1
Sourcenpm+mcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/20
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
✓CVE scan · clean+30/30
✓Static analysis · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
Dependencies✓ 60 resolved+ · none vulnerable
Tool surface5 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanv0.1.1 · 1mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedAug 26, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

5 tools · none privileged
Statically extracted from the published packagev0.1.1 · 1mo ago

Read out of the source npm actually ships, at scan time. The package was never executed. Tools registered dynamically at runtime, or hidden inside bundled or minified code, can be missed — so this is a floor on the tool surface, not a complete census of it.

analyze_defi_risksAnalyze a Solidity smart contract for DeFi-specific risks: rug pull patterns, honeypot indicators, flash loan vulnerabilities, MEV risks, and composability issues

Analyze a Solidity smart contract for DeFi-specific risks: rug pull patterns, honeypot indicators, flash loan vulnerabilities, MEV risks, and composability issues

No input schema was published for this tool.

analyze_defi_directoryRecursively scan a directory of Solidity files for DeFi-specific risks and generate a combined report

Recursively scan a directory of Solidity files for DeFi-specific risks and generate a combined report

No input schema was published for this tool.

analyze_defi_snippetAnalyze a Solidity code snippet for DeFi risks without needing a file

Analyze a Solidity code snippet for DeFi risks without needing a file

No input schema was published for this tool.

rug_pull_checklistGenerate a comprehensive rug pull safety checklist for a token/DeFi contract. Returns a pass/fail checklist covering ownership, minting, fees, liquidity, and upgradeability.

Generate a comprehensive rug pull safety checklist for a token/DeFi contract. Returns a pass/fail checklist covering ownership, minting, fees, liquidity, and upgradeability.

No input schema was published for this tool.

list_defi_patternsList all DeFi risk patterns that DeFiGuard can detect

List all DeFi risk patterns that DeFiGuard can detect

No input schema was published for this tool.

5 of 5 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

DeFiGuard MCP Server - DeFi protocol risk analysis tools for AI coding agents. Analyze token contracts, detect rug pull patterns, check DeFi composability risks.

Keywords
mcpmcp-servermodel-context-protocoldefirug-pulltoken-analysisflash-loanethereumevmweb3securityrisk-analysiscomposabilityprotocol-riskhoneypotslippageliquidityclaude-codecursorai-codingai-agent
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

Dependency tree

What one Forge scan resolved from npm metadata on 2026-08-31 — observed resolution, not a publisher declaration.

60 packages resolved · 2 direct · none carrying advisories Resolution stops at depth 4 and 60 packages.

The crawl stopped at the depth-4 limit. Anything below that level was never resolved.

The crawl stopped at the 60-package limit. The rest of the tree was never resolved.

36 more resolved packages are not drawn here (display cap: 24). Every dependency carrying an advisory is drawn regardless of the cap. Full inventory (CycloneDX SBOM)

Declared but not resolved

53 declared dependencies never landed in the tree. They are missing from Forge's resolution, not from the package.

+41 more not listed. The counts by reason above cover all of them.

Not followed: peerDependencies. This tree covers runtime dependencies only, so anything those pull in was never resolved.

Topics

Related in crypto & web3