dev.realitygraph/verification-tools

MCPcommunitylive
v2.0.0dev.realitygraphUnknownUpdated 2mo ago

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Endpoint healthlive
checked 3 days ago · 678ms
100% of the last 5 checks reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
2mo agoLast update
Package
Authordev.realitygraph
LicenseUnknown
Version2.0.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: this listing has no repository on file, so `forge publish` cannot verify ownership automatically. Use "Claim this listing" above — Forge reviews these by hand.
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
✓Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
✓Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface10 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanvlive · 22d agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJul 3, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

10 tools · none privileged
Observed live from the vendor's endpoint22d ago

Read from a real MCP initialize → tools/list handshake against the declared endpoint. No tool was ever invoked — tools/list is the read-only introspection call the protocol defines for this. It reflects what the server advertised at that moment; a hosted endpoint is not pinned to any version and can change without notice.

  • https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp10 tools · 826ms
check_verification_debtEstimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

Estimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (G…

ParameterTypeDescription
team_size*integerNumber of developers on the team (required)
ai_share_percentnumberShare of merges that are AI-assisted, in percent (default: 60, assumption)
prs_per_monthintegerTotal merged PRs per month (default: team_size x prs_per_engineer_per_month)
merged_loc_per_weeknumberMerged changed lines of code per week (enables the GVR and review-depth metrics)
reviewer_hours_per_weeknumberReviewer hours actually spent per week (enables the GVR metric)
substantive_review_comments_per_weeknumberSubstantive review comments per week, excluding bots and nitpicks (enables the review-depth metric)
ai_merges_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month (enables the unverified-merge rate)
ai_merges_with_evidence_per_monthintegerAI-assisted merges per month with recorded validation evidence (enables the unverified-merge rate)
two_week_churn_percentnumberShare of new lines revised or reverted within 14 days, in percent. A warning signal in the metrics block; it never enters the cost model, because it measures l…
rework_rate_percentnumberShare of AI-assisted changes reworked for a defect within 14 days, in percent (default: 2, the illustrative rate from /cost-of-verification-debt - replace it w…
prs_per_engineer_per_monthnumberMerged PRs per engineer per month (default: 20, derived from the published worked report on /measure-verification-debt)
hourly_rate_eurnumberLoaded cost per engineer hour in EUR (default: 75, assumption)
hours_per_reworked_changenumberAverage hours per reworked change (default: 6, assumption)
review_reconstruction_hours_per_prnumberAverage reviewer hours spent reconstructing intent per AI-assisted PR (default: 0.5, assumption)
incident_allowance_eur_per_yearnumberAnnual incident allowance in EUR (default: 0; add one only when you have a locally defined incident class, frequency and expected-loss method)
langstringReport language (default: en)
lint_task_specCheck whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

Check whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without…

ParameterTypeDescription
task*stringThe work order / task text you intend to give an AI coding agent (English or German)
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_task_contract_templateReturns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

Returns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Wr…

ParameterTypeDescription
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
validate_task_contractDeterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

Deterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and le…

ParameterTypeDescription
contract*stringThe filled task contract as a JSON string (structure from get_task_contract_template, format='json')
langstringReport language (default: en)
get_verification_report_templateReturns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

Returns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and t…

ParameterTypeDescription
formatstringTemplate format (default: markdown)
langstringLanguage (default: en)
searchFull-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

Full-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governa…

ParameterTypeDescription
query*stringSearch query (English or German)
langstringRestrict results to one language (default: both)
fetchFetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

Fetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.

ParameterTypeDescription
id*stringDocument id from search results, or a realitygraph.dev URL
plan_change_verificationTurn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

Turn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.

ParameterTypeDescription
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
check_release_readinessReturn GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

Return GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.

ParameterTypeDescription
change_summary*stringPlain-language summary of the change
change_types*arrayTechnical and risk-relevant change types
blast_radius*stringLargest expected impact boundary
rollback*stringCurrent rollback or recovery state
langstringResponse language (default: en)
acceptance_criteria_passed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_failed*integer—
acceptance_criteria_not_run*integer—
checks*array—
rollback_ready*boolean—
monitoring_ready*boolean—
known_limitations_recorded*boolean—
independent_review*boolean—
calculate_verification_capacityCalculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

Calculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.

ParameterTypeDescription
ai_changes_per_week*integer—
average_review_minutes_per_change*number—
available_reviewer_hours_per_week*number—
evidence_coverage_percent*number—
two_week_churn_percentnumber—
langstringResponse language (default: en)

10 of 10 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

Read-only AI coding tools for change verification, release readiness, capacity, and guidance.

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.