io.github.MICONNM/openclaw-consensus-mcp

MCPcommunity
v0.1.1io.github.MICONNMUnknownUpdated 5mo agoGitHub

9-LLM consensus + disagreement scoring + cheapest-route picks to fight hallucinations.

Multi-model consensus inside MCP clients: compare answers, surface disagreement, and escalate only when needed. OpenClaw Consensus MCP wraps the OpenClaw Consensus API as three Model Context Protocol tools. It is designed for workflows where a maintainer wants a second opinion before accepting a risky answer, review summary, or routing decision. OpenClaw runs the same prompt across multiple…

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
5mo agoLast update
Package
Authorio.github.MICONNM
LicenseUnknown
Version0.1.1
Sourcemcp-registry
GitHubMICONNM/openclaw-consensus-mcp
SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/20
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
✓CVE scan · clean+30/30
✓Static analysis · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface—
Security scan✓ Cleanv0.1.1 · 3mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 13, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

No tool declarations found in the source3mo ago

Forge read 0 source files from the published package tarball and matched no MCP tool registrations. Extraction is pattern-based over shipped source: a server that builds its tool list at runtime, or that ships only bundled or minified code, registers nothing this can see. Treat it as “not detected”, not as “exposes none”.

About

Multi-model consensus inside MCP clients: compare answers, surface disagreement, and escalate only when needed. OpenClaw Consensus MCP wraps the OpenClaw Consensus API as three Model Context Protocol tools. It is designed for workflows where a maintainer wants a second opinion before accepting a risky answer, review summary, or routing decision. OpenClaw runs the same prompt across multiple models, then returns: a consensus answer with confidence and model response metadata, a disagreement…

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

Forge's dependency resolver reads npm metadata only, so this PyPI package has no resolved tree. That is a gap in coverage, not a clean bill of health.