io.github.UnbearableDev/dockerfile-audit

MCPcommunitylive
v1.0.0io.github.UnbearableDevUnknownUpdated 4mo agoGitHub

Hadolint-grade Dockerfile audit — 19 checks: secrets, privileges, supply chain, hygiene.

Hadolint-grade Dockerfile audit as an MCP server. 18+ checks across 5 categories, every finding ships with severity, line number, remediation text, and a copy-paste Dockerfile snippet. Built by Unbearable Labs. Pay-per-event pricing — only billed when a tool is actually called. Apify Actor Store — primary, metered usage (PPE) MCPize — pending submission MCP.so — pending submission PulseMCP —…

Endpoint healthlive
checked 9 days ago · 33ms · auth required
100% of the last 5 checks reached this endpoint
Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotChatGPTGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
4mo agoLast update
Package
Authorio.github.UnbearableDev
LicenseUnknown
Version1.0.0
Sourcemcp-registry
GitHubUnbearableDev/dockerfile-audit
SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the repo to claim ownership
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
✓Prompt-injection scan · clean+30/30
✓Obfuscation / exfil scan · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface—
Security scan✓ CleanvHEAD · 3mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 13, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

No tool declarations found in the source3mo ago

Forge read 0 source files from the repository archive and matched no MCP tool registrations. Extraction is pattern-based over shipped source: a server that builds its tool list at runtime, or that ships only bundled or minified code, registers nothing this can see. Treat it as “not detected”, not as “exposes none”.

About

Hadolint-grade Dockerfile audit as an MCP server. 18+ checks across 5 categories, every finding ships with severity, line number, remediation text, and a copy-paste Dockerfile snippet. Built by Unbearable Labs. Pay-per-event pricing — only billed when a tool is actually called. Apify Actor Store — primary, metered usage (PPE) MCPize — pending submission MCP.so — pending submission PulseMCP — pending submission Smithery — pending submission Glama — pending submission Newsletter: Unbearable…

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.