Validate and verify data from other agents before acting on it. Zero LLM costs.
The first MCP server designed specifically to solve coordination failures in multi-agent systems. Built by Agenson Horrowitz based on the MAST study showing 36.9% of multi-agent failures are coordination breakdowns. 41-86% of multi-agent systems fail. But here's what nobody talks about: 36.9% of these failures aren't bugs—they're coordination breakdowns. Agent A works perfectly ✅ Agent B works…
Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.
Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.
Read out of the source npm actually ships, at scan time. The package was never executed. Tools registered dynamically at runtime, or hidden inside bundled or minified code, can be missed — so this is a floor on the tool surface, not a complete census of it.
verify_json_schemaNo description publishedThis tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.
detect_hallucination_markersNo description publishedThis tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.
validate_data_freshnessNo description publishedThis tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.
cross_reference_checkNo description publishedThis tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.
output_consistency_scoreNo description publishedThis tool published no description. Forge does not invent one.
0 of 5 tools published a description.
Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.
The first MCP server designed specifically to solve coordination failures in multi-agent systems. Built by Agenson Horrowitz based on the MAST study showing 36.9% of multi-agent failures are coordination breakdowns. 41-86% of multi-agent systems fail. But here's what nobody talks about: 36.9% of these failures aren't bugs—they're coordination breakdowns. Agent A works perfectly ✅ Agent B works perfectly ✅ They fail when they interact ❌ The problem? No systematic validation at the handoff…
Linked names open Forge’s index of every entry observed exposing that tool. Browse all indexed tools.
This package was last scanned before Forge began storing the resolved tree. The next scan will record it.