io.github.antonbabenko/deliberation

MCPcommunity
v3.5.4io.github.antonbabenkoUnknownUpdated 2mo agonpm

Second opinions in Claude Code and any MCP host from GPT, Gemini, Grok, and 400+ OpenRouter models.

Get a second opinion from GPT, Gemini, Grok, and 400+ OpenRouter models - and let them reach a cross-model consensus - from inside any MCP host (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Kiro, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed, ...). One model is a guess. Three that agree is a plan. This is the standalone MCP server. For the Claude Code plugin, one-click install buttons, and full docs, see the repo: You stay the primary…

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn't been ruled out — it just isn't something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
2mo agoLast update
Package
Authorio.github.antonbabenko
LicenseUnknown
Version3.5.4
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
F
10/100Untrusted
Listed in Forge index+10/10
Publisher identity verified+0/20
Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
Domain verification+0/5
Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
npm maintainer match+0/5
Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
CVE scan · not run+0/30
Not yet scanned — package must be on npm
Static analysis · clean+0/20
Not yet scanned — package must be on npm
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain
Provenance
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface
Security scanNot run
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 13, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts — it cannot prove the absence of malicious code.

Tools

Not scanned yet

Forge has no scan on record for this entry, so it holds no observation of its tool surface. That is an absence of evidence, not evidence that it exposes no tools.

About

Get a second opinion from GPT, Gemini, Grok, and 400+ OpenRouter models - and let them reach a cross-model consensus - from inside any MCP host (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Kiro, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed, ...). One model is a guess. Three that agree is a plan. This is the standalone MCP server. For the Claude Code plugin, one-click install buttons, and full docs, see the repo: You stay the primary agent. When a task needs a second opinion or cross-model review, call one of the tools below, read…

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…