io.github.cyberwareX/cyberwarex-council

MCPcommunity
v1.1.2io.github.cyberwareXUnknownUpdated 5d agoGitHub

Second opinion for agents: 3-4 AI models answer, one verdict with confidence and dissent.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
5d agoLast update
Reads these credentials
  • CWX_X_PAYMENTAPI keyoptional

    Optional x402 X-PAYMENT header. If unset, the server opts into the free trial and then surfaces the 402 invoice to the agent so its own x402 client can pay and retry.

  • CWX_SUBSCRIPTION_KEYAPI keyoptional

    Optional prepaid credit key (cwx_...) from https://safe.cyberwarex.com/subscribe, so no per-call signing is needed.

Declared by the author in the official MCP registry. Forge does not store, broker, or ever see these values — the config below is scaffolded with placeholders you fill in locally.

Package
Authorio.github.cyberwareX
LicenseUnknown
Version1.1.2
Sourcemcp-registry
GitHubcyberwareX/cyberwarex-mcp
SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓
Trust Status
F
10/100Untrusted
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/30
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the repo to claim ownership
—Domain verification+0/10
→ Not currently available for this listing type — the domain-verification check only runs for npm-backed packages today, so this row cannot be earned here yet regardless of what's hosted at the domain.
—Prompt-injection scan · not run+0/30
→ Not yet scanned — the repository archive is scanned on the next cron run
—Obfuscation / exfil scan · not run+0/20
→ Not yet scanned — the repository archive is scanned on the next cron run
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface—
Security scanNot runHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedOct 1, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

Not scanned yet

Forge has no scan on record for this entry, so it holds no observation of its tool surface. That is an absence of evidence, not evidence that it exposes no tools.

About

Second opinion for agents: 3-4 AI models answer, one verdict with confidence and dissent.

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.