Go code coverage analysis tool with MCP server for AI-powered coverage workflows
Agent-loop coverage governance — coverage your AI coding agent calls before commit, not a dashboard you read after CI. Get started ↓ · What it looks like ↓ · MCP tools ↓ · CLI reference ↓ · Why this exists ↓ · Community ↓ "Our AI agents ship code fast, but they're blind to coverage policy while editing. We only see breakage in CI, after context is gone, and the same agent then guesses its way to…
Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.
Forge read 2 source files from the repository archive and matched no MCP tool registrations. Extraction is pattern-based over shipped source: a server that builds its tool list at runtime, or that ships only bundled or minified code, registers nothing this can see. Treat it as “not detected”, not as “exposes none”.
Agent-loop coverage governance — coverage your AI coding agent calls before commit, not a dashboard you read after CI. Get started ↓ · What it looks like ↓ · MCP tools ↓ · CLI reference ↓ · Why this exists ↓ · Community ↓ "Our AI agents ship code fast, but they're blind to coverage policy while editing. We only see breakage in CI, after context is gone, and the same agent then guesses its way to a fix." Works best on standard Go/Python/JavaScript/Java/Rust projects with conventional layouts.…
This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.