io.github.saicharanrajoju/letswork

MCPcommunity
v3.0.0io.github.saicharanrajojuUnknownUpdated 5mo agoGitHub

Real-time collaborative coding via MCP — two developers, one codebase

Real-time collaborative coding via Claude Code — two developers, one codebase, each using their own Claude subscription. One developer hosts the session. The other joins from anywhere. Both get a live Claude Code window connected to the same project — with file locking and an approval system to prevent conflicts. 1. Host runs inside their project folder 2. A secure HTTPS tunnel is created…

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
5mo agoLast update
Package
Authorio.github.saicharanrajoju
LicenseUnknown
Version3.0.0
Sourcemcp-registry
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/20
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
✓CVE scan · clean+30/30
✓Static analysis · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
DependenciesNot audited
Tool surface—
Security scan✓ Cleanv3.0.0 · 3mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedJun 13, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

No tool declarations found in the source3mo ago

Forge read 0 source files from the published package tarball and matched no MCP tool registrations. Extraction is pattern-based over shipped source: a server that builds its tool list at runtime, or that ships only bundled or minified code, registers nothing this can see. Treat it as “not detected”, not as “exposes none”.

About

Real-time collaborative coding via Claude Code — two developers, one codebase, each using their own Claude subscription. One developer hosts the session. The other joins from anywhere. Both get a live Claude Code window connected to the same project — with file locking and an approval system to prevent conflicts. 1. Host runs inside their project folder 2. A secure HTTPS tunnel is created automatically via Cloudflare 3. A one-time URL + guest token is generated and printed 4. Host shares the…

Keywords
mcp
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

No dependency coverage

Forge's dependency resolver reads npm metadata only, so this PyPI package has no resolved tree. That is a gap in coverage, not a clean bill of health.