Real-time collaborative coding via MCP — two developers, one codebase
Real-time collaborative coding via Claude Code — two developers, one codebase, each using their own Claude subscription. One developer hosts the session. The other joins from anywhere. Both get a live Claude Code window connected to the same project — with file locking and an approval system to prevent conflicts. 1. Host runs inside their project folder 2. A secure HTTPS tunnel is created…
Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.
Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.
Forge read 0 source files from the published package tarball and matched no MCP tool registrations. Extraction is pattern-based over shipped source: a server that builds its tool list at runtime, or that ships only bundled or minified code, registers nothing this can see. Treat it as “not detected”, not as “exposes none”.
Real-time collaborative coding via Claude Code — two developers, one codebase, each using their own Claude subscription. One developer hosts the session. The other joins from anywhere. Both get a live Claude Code window connected to the same project — with file locking and an approval system to prevent conflicts. 1. Host runs inside their project folder 2. A secure HTTPS tunnel is created automatically via Cloudflare 3. A one-time URL + guest token is generated and printed 4. Host shares the…
Forge's dependency resolver reads npm metadata only, so this PyPI package has no resolved tree. That is a gap in coverage, not a clean bill of health.