Evaluates UI designs for WCAG accessibility issues automated scanners miss. Paid via x402 on Base.
Inferred from the transports this listing declares (streamable-http). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.
Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.
Read from a real MCP initialize → tools/list handshake against the declared endpoint. No tool was ever invoked — tools/list is the read-only introspection call the protocol defines for this. It reflects what the server advertised at that moment; a hosted endpoint is not pinned to any version and can change without notice.
https://axcess-mcp-server.fly.dev/mcp3 tools · 56mslist_capabilitiesReturns available evaluation tools, what they check, and their pricing.
Call this first to understand what Axcess can evaluate and how much each evaluation costs.
This tool is FREE. All evaluation tools require USDC payment on Base network.
Returns: JSON with tool descriptions, pricing, and rubri…Returns available evaluation tools, what they check, and their pricing. Call this first to understand what Axcess can evaluate and how much each evaluation costs. This tool is FREE. All evaluation tools require USDC payment on Base network. Returns: JSON with tool descriptions, pricing, and rubri…
No input schema was published for this tool.
evaluate_typographyEvaluates typography elements against a principled accessibility rubric.
COST: $0.05 USDC via x402 on Base-compatible EVM network per call.
Goes beyond what axe/Lighthouse/WAVE can check — evaluates design judgment, not just
numeric compliance. Catches issues like:
- Contrast that passes WCAG 4.5…Evaluates typography elements against a principled accessibility rubric. COST: $0.05 USDC via x402 on Base-compatible EVM network per call. Goes beyond what axe/Lighthouse/WAVE can check — evaluates design judgment, not just numeric compliance. Catches issues like: - Contrast that passes WCAG 4.5…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| elements* | array | Array of typography elements to evaluate |
| screen_name | string | Name of the screen or component being evaluated |
evaluate_accessibilityEvaluates UI elements for accessibility issues that automated scanners miss.
COST: $0.01 USDC via x402 on Base-compatible EVM network per call.
Checks beyond what axe/Lighthouse/WAVE catch at the design stage:
- Touch targets below 24×24px (WCAG 2.5.8 AA hard fail)
- Touch targets below 44×44px (…Evaluates UI elements for accessibility issues that automated scanners miss. COST: $0.01 USDC via x402 on Base-compatible EVM network per call. Checks beyond what axe/Lighthouse/WAVE catch at the design stage: - Touch targets below 24×24px (WCAG 2.5.8 AA hard fail) - Touch targets below 44×44px (…
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| elements* | array | Array of UI elements to evaluate |
| screen_name | string | Name of the screen or component being evaluated |
3 of 3 tools published a description.
Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.
Evaluates UI designs for WCAG accessibility issues automated scanners miss. Paid via x402 on Base.
Linked names open Forge’s index of every entry observed exposing that tool. Browse all indexed tools.
This entry publishes no npm package, so Forge has no dependency tree for it. That is a gap in coverage — not a statement that it has no dependencies.