nel-veil-mcp

MCPcommunity
v0.2.0NEL ProfessionalMITUpdated 1mo agonpmGitHub

Free passive security scanning for AI agents. Check any domain for email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain takeover risk — using public information only, no intrusive probing.

Works in
ClaudeCursorCopilotGemini

Inferred from the transports this listing declares (stdio). A client not listed here hasn’t been ruled out — it just isn’t something Forge can confirm.

Automatically indexed from public sources. Not yet verified by the developer on Forge.Claim this listing →
1kDownloads/wk
1mo agoLast update
Package
AuthorNEL Professional
LicenseMIT
Version0.2.0
Sourcenpm+mcp-registry
npmnel-veil-mcp
GitHubNELPROINC/nel-veil-mcp
SBOMCycloneDX 1.6 ↓
Trust Status
B
60/100Good
✓Listed in Forge index+10/10
—Publisher identity verified+0/20
→ Publisher: run `forge publish` from the package repo to claim ownership
—Ed25519 publish signature+0/5
→ Included automatically when the publisher runs `forge publish`
—Domain verification+0/5
→ Publisher: host /.well-known/forge.json on the package homepage with { "publisher": "<github-login>" }
—npm Trusted Publishing (Sigstore)+0/5
→ Publish from GitHub Actions with --provenance so the attestation binds this package to this repo
—npm maintainer match+0/5
→ Earned once your identity is verified above and that login is an npm maintainer of this package
✓CVE scan · clean+30/30
✓Static analysis · clean+20/20
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any AI assistant to fix all gaps
StatusCommunity-indexed
PublisherUnverified
SignatureUnsigned
Domain—
Provenance—
Dependencies✓ 60 resolved+ · none vulnerable
Tool surface9 tools · none privileged
Security scan✓ Cleanv0.2.0 · 1mo agoHow well does this scan work?
EvalsNone
IndexedAug 26, 2026

Verification confirms publisher identity (repo ownership), not code safety. The security scan covers known CVEs and suspicious install scripts.

Tools

9 tools · none privileged
Statically extracted from the published packagev0.2.0 · 1mo ago

Read out of the source npm actually ships, at scan time. The package was never executed. Tools registered dynamically at runtime, or hidden inside bundled or minified code, can be missed — so this is a floor on the tool surface, not a complete census of it.

check_email_spoofingAnswers: can someone send email that appears to come from this domain?

Answers: can someone send email that appears to come from this domain?

No input schema was published for this tool.

check_tlsAnswers: does this domain's TLS configuration have known weaknesses?

Answers: does this domain's TLS configuration have known weaknesses?

No input schema was published for this tool.

check_security_headersAnswers: does this site send the HTTP response headers that protect visitors in the browser?

Answers: does this site send the HTTP response headers that protect visitors in the browser?

No input schema was published for this tool.

check_exposed_filesAnswers: is this domain publicly serving files it should not be?

Answers: is this domain publicly serving files it should not be?

No input schema was published for this tool.

check_subdomain_takeoverAnswers: does this domain have DNS records pointing at services someone else could claim?

Answers: does this domain have DNS records pointing at services someone else could claim?

No input schema was published for this tool.

scan_domainAnswers: what is this domain's overall security posture?

Answers: what is this domain's overall security posture?

No input schema was published for this tool.

get_scan_reportAnswers: what did an earlier NEL VEIL scan find?

Answers: what did an earlier NEL VEIL scan find?

No input schema was published for this tool.

list_compliance_frameworksAnswers: which laws, regulations and standards can this tool report on, and which can it not?

Answers: which laws, regulations and standards can this tool report on, and which can it not?

No input schema was published for this tool.

check_complianceAnswers: what do this domain's public-facing security signals suggest about its alignment with the laws and standards that apply to it?

Answers: what do this domain's public-facing security signals suggest about its alignment with the laws and standards that apply to it?

No input schema was published for this tool.

9 of 9 tools published a description.

Tool names and descriptions are written by the publisher and shown verbatim as inert text. They are the strings an MCP client passes to a model, so Forge scans them for prompt-injection patterns — any finding appears with the security scan above. “Privileged” is a keyword match on the tool name, not an audit of what the tool does: a benign-sounding name can still do anything.

About

Free passive security scanning for AI agents. Check any domain for email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain takeover risk — using public information only, no intrusive probing.

Keywords
mcpmodelcontextprotocolmcp-serversecuritysecurity-scannerdmarcspfdkimemail-spoofingtlssslsecurity-headerssubdomain-takeoverdomain-securityosintpassive-scanningai-agent
Alternatives
Comparing tool surfaces…

Tools exposed

9 tools · none privileged · observed by static extraction. A tool surface is what one scan read on one day, not a live capability list.

Linked names open Forge’s index of every entry observed exposing that tool. Browse all indexed tools.

Dependency tree

What one Forge scan resolved from npm metadata on 2026-09-02 — observed resolution, not a publisher declaration.

60 packages resolved · 2 direct · none carrying advisories Resolution stops at depth 4 and 60 packages.

The crawl stopped at the depth-4 limit. Anything below that level was never resolved.

The crawl stopped at the 60-package limit. The rest of the tree was never resolved.

36 more resolved packages are not drawn here (display cap: 24). Every dependency carrying an advisory is drawn regardless of the cap. Full inventory (CycloneDX SBOM)

Declared but not resolved

54 declared dependencies never landed in the tree. They are missing from Forge's resolution, not from the package.

+42 more not listed. The counts by reason above cover all of them.

Not followed: peerDependencies. This tree covers runtime dependencies only, so anything those pull in was never resolved.

Topics

Related in security