scientific-critical-thinking

SKILLWorkflowcommunity
v0.0.0K-Dense-AIMITUpdated 3d agoSource →

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For for

Community-submitted skill. Not yet reviewed by the Forge team. Full prompt content may not be available.Request review →
2kRepo stars
1Clients
1Formats
3d agoLast update
Skill
AuthorK-Dense-AI
Version0.0.0
LicenseMIT
CategoryWorkflow
Formatsskill.md
PromptOpen (see Prompt tab)
Compatibility
Claude✓ Supported
Cursor
Copilot
ChatGPT
Gemini
About

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

Keywords
skillclaude